On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 17:54 +0800, Keith Hopkins wrote:
> On 02/20/2008 11:48 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 10:22 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> >> I'll see if I can come up with patches to fix this ... or at least
> >> mitigate the problems it causes.
> >
> > Darrick's wor
On 02/20/2008 11:48 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 10:22 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
>> I'll see if I can come up with patches to fix this ... or at least
>> mitigate the problems it causes.
>
> Darrick's working on the ascb sequencer use after free problem.
>
> I looked int
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 10:22 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> I'll see if I can come up with patches to fix this ... or at least
> mitigate the problems it causes.
Darrick's working on the ascb sequencer use after free problem.
I looked into some of the error handling in libsas, and apparently
that
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 22:26 +0800, Keith Hopkins wrote:
> Well, that made life interesting
> but didn't seem to fix anything.
>
> The behavior is about the same as before, but with more verbose
> errors. I failed one member of the raid and had it rebuild as a
> test...which hangs for a whil
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 22:26 +0800, Keith Hopkins wrote:
> Well, that made life interesting
> but didn't seem to fix anything.
>
> The behavior is about the same as before, but with more verbose
> errors. I failed one member of the raid and had it rebuild as a
> test...which hangs for a whil
On 02/15/2008 11:28 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 00:11 +0800, Keith Hopkins wrote:
>> On 01/31/2008 03:29 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 06:59:34PM +0800, Keith Hopkins wrote:
V28. My controller functions well with a single drive (low-medium load)
On 02/15/2008 11:28 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> If you're willing, could you try this patch which may correct the
> problem? It's sort of like falling off a cliff: if you never go near
> the edge (i.e. you upgrade the drive fw) you never fall off;
> alternatively, it would be nice if you could he
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 00:11 +0800, Keith Hopkins wrote:
> On 01/31/2008 03:29 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 06:59:34PM +0800, Keith Hopkins wrote:
> >> V28. My controller functions well with a single drive (low-medium load).
> >> Unfortunately, all attempts to get the mi
On 01/31/2008 03:29 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 06:59:34PM +0800, Keith Hopkins wrote:
>> V28. My controller functions well with a single drive (low-medium load).
>> Unfortunately, all attempts to get the mirrors in sync fail and usually hang
>> the whole box.
>
> Adap
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 06:59:34PM +0800, Keith Hopkins wrote:
>
> V28. My controller functions well with a single drive (low-medium load).
> Unfortunately, all attempts to get the mirrors in sync fail and usually hang
> the whole box.
Adaptec posted a V30 sequencer on their website; does tha
On 01/30/2008 05:14 PM, Jan Sembera wrote:
>
> We tried firmware versions V28, V30, and even V32 that is, as
> far as I know, not yet available on adaptec website. All of them were
> unfortunately displaying exactly the same behaviour :-(. Did you get your
> SAS controller working? And if so
> We've tried new adaptec firmware shipped with SLES and we got
> ourselves new error string that appears just above error messages that you
> have seen before and that were attached to the original message:
> kernel: aic94xx: escb_tasklet_complete: REQ_TASK_ABORT, reason=0x6
> kernel: aic94xx
12 matches
Mail list logo
