Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>
> Just at the top of my head without looking at the code at all. I would
> say the bigest change would be the use of use_sg != 0 for all commands
> in Later kernels. (k>=2.6.17)
>
> Look for and around the scsi_cmnd->request_buffer usage. It used to be
> that for commands lik
On Thu, Oct 25 2007 at 15:03 +0200, Alexander Sabourenkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello.
>
>
> Background:
> Promise TX4 SATA300 with sata_promise driver generates lots of errors,
> both read and write.
>
> I'm now trying to port Promise-written driver, which works ok with
>
Hello.
Background:
Promise TX4 SATA300 with sata_promise driver generates lots of errors,
both read and write.
I'm now trying to port Promise-written driver, which works ok with
2.6.11, to 2.6.22,
so that I can hopefully discover the error-inducing difference between
them, and gain
3 matches
Mail list logo