Re: SCSI luns

2005-07-15 Thread Patrick Mansfield
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 12:17:53PM -0400, James Bottomley wrote: > Thanks for redirecting to the correct list. > > On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 13:38 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 16:52 +0530, Amrut Joshi wrote: > > > Currently linux scsi subsystem doesnt store the 8-byte luns

Re: SCSI luns

2005-07-12 Thread James Bottomley
Thanks for redirecting to the correct list. On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 13:38 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 16:52 +0530, Amrut Joshi wrote: > > Currently linux scsi subsystem doesnt store the 8-byte luns which are > > recieved in REPORT_LUNS reply. This information is forver los

Re: SCSI luns

2005-07-12 Thread Amrut Joshi
Hi, On 7/12/05, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 16:52 +0530, Amrut Joshi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Currently linux scsi subsystem doesnt store the 8-byte luns which are > > recieved in REPORT_LUNS reply. This information is forver lost once > > the scan is over. In

Re: SCSI luns

2005-07-12 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 16:52 +0530, Amrut Joshi wrote: > Hi, > > Currently linux scsi subsystem doesnt store the 8-byte luns which are > recieved in REPORT_LUNS reply. This information is forver lost once > the scan is over. In my LDD I need this information. Currently I have > to snoop REPORT_LUN