On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 03:15:20PM +, James Bottomley wrote:
> And I thought the world was ending when Linus started top posting ...
I think it's quite usual style if you ask a bytestander to comment on a
whole mail - there's not specific context to quote in that case.
> You mean apart from t
And I thought the world was ending when Linus started top posting ...
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 00:40 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> James, and comments on this?
You mean apart from the fact that it's a long series which seems to self
confess to providing not much value and therefore not rating it
James, and comments on this?
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 02:05:45PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> This patch series consists of four patches that address device
> removal issues and three patches that improve performance of the
> SCSI mid-layer.
>
> The individual patches are.
> 0001-Introduce-scsi
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 23:48 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 01:38:04PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > , I only care about the performance against upstream code, so that
> > would mean scsi_debug here. Typically the onus of demonstrating a
> > performance improvem
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 01:38:04PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> , I only care about the performance against upstream code, so that
> would mean scsi_debug here. Typically the onus of demonstrating a
> performance improvement is on the patch submitter (eg: not the
> reviewer).
Do you real
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 20:00 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 08/20/13 19:04, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 18:15 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >> On 08/20/13 18:11, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 14:05 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> This
On 08/20/13 19:04, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 18:15 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 08/20/13 18:11, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 14:05 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
This patch series consists of four patches that address device removal
issues and
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 18:15 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 08/20/13 18:11, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 14:05 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >> This patch series consists of four patches that address device removal
> >> issues and three patches that improve performanc
On 08/20/13 18:11, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 14:05 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
This patch series consists of four patches that address device removal
issues and three patches that improve performance of the SCSI mid-layer.
Perhaps it would be useful to know what the
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 14:05 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> This patch series consists of four patches that address device removal
> issues and three patches that improve performance of the SCSI mid-layer.
>
Perhaps it would be useful to know what the performance improvement
actually is..? Eg:
This patch series consists of four patches that address device removal
issues and three patches that improve performance of the SCSI mid-layer.
The individual patches are.
0001-Introduce-scsi_device_being_removed.patch
0002-Rework-scsi_internal_device_unblock.patch
0003-Avoid-re-enabling-I-O-aft
11 matches
Mail list logo
