Mike Christie wrote:
Andrew Vasquez wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Mike Christie wrote:
Andrew Vasquez wrote:
Speaking of which, are there any major objections to the patches
proposed here:
Add scsi_target_[un]block() and scsi_target_remove() generics
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=1108
Andrew Vasquez wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Mike Christie wrote:
Andrew Vasquez wrote:
Speaking of which, are there any major objections to the patches
proposed here:
Add scsi_target_[un]block() and scsi_target_remove() generics
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=110867050306738&w=2
[RFC]
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Mike Christie wrote:
> Andrew Vasquez wrote:
> >
> >Speaking of which, are there any major objections to the patches
> >proposed here:
> >
> >Add scsi_target_[un]block() and scsi_target_remove() generics
> >http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=110867050306738&w=2
> >
>
Andrew Vasquez wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Mike Christie wrote:
The attached patch copies the code from the fc transport
class which allows a LLD to block and unblock a device.
The block/unblock code is used by the iscsi-sfnet
driver in replacement of a internal timer doing the
same thing.
I under
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Mike Christie wrote:
> The attached patch copies the code from the fc transport
> class which allows a LLD to block and unblock a device.
> The block/unblock code is used by the iscsi-sfnet
> driver in replacement of a internal timer doing the
> same thing.
>
> I understand t
5 matches
Mail list logo
