Re: SATA status report updated

2005-08-21 Thread Mogens Valentin
Jeff Garzik wrote: Mogens Valentin wrote: Jeff, is it possible for you at this time to comment on support for the JMicron JMB360 sataII chip? Possible timeframe? Never heard of it. Neigher had I. It's being used on the ASrock 939-SATAII mobo, in conjunction with the ULi M1695 chipset. I w

Re: SATA status report updated

2005-08-21 Thread Mogens Valentin
Jeff Garzik wrote: Although I have not updated it in several weeks, folks may wish to refer to the hardware status report as well: http://linux.yyz.us/sata/sata-status.html Jeff, is it possible for you at this time to comment on support for the JMicron JMB360 sataII chip? Possible timef

Re: SATA status report updated

2005-08-21 Thread Jeff Garzik
Mogens Valentin wrote: Jeff, is it possible for you at this time to comment on support for the JMicron JMB360 sataII chip? Possible timeframe? Never heard of it. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: SATA status report updated

2005-08-19 Thread Simon Oosthoek
Jeff Garzik wrote: Things in SATA-land have been moving along recently, so I updated the software status report: http://linux.yyz.us/sata/software-status.html Although I have not updated it in several weeks, folks may wish to refer to the hardware status report as well: http://lin

Re: SATA status report updated

2005-08-13 Thread Erik Slagter
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 17:30 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Things in SATA-land have been moving along recently, so I updated the > >>software status report: > >> > >>http://linux.yyz.us/sata/software-status.html > > > >

Re: SATA status report updated

2005-08-12 Thread Jeff Garzik
Mogens Valentin wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: Things in SATA-land have been moving along recently, so I updated the software status report: http://linux.yyz.us/sata/software-status.html >> Queueing support, NCQ: >> #3 will be supported by libata, for all hardware and devices that >> s

Re: SATA status report updated

2005-08-12 Thread Jeff Garzik
Matthew Garrett wrote: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Things in SATA-land have been moving along recently, so I updated the software status report: http://linux.yyz.us/sata/software-status.html I couldn't see any reference to system-wide power management (ie, suspend/resume

Re: SATA status report updated

2005-08-12 Thread Mogens Valentin
Jeff Garzik wrote: Things in SATA-land have been moving along recently, so I updated the software status report: http://linux.yyz.us/sata/software-status.html >> Queueing support, NCQ: >> #3 will be supported by libata, for all hardware and devices that >> support NCQ. I guess this mea

Re: SATA status report updated

2005-08-12 Thread David Greaves
Jeff Garzik wrote: > > True enough :/ > > It's been feature-complete for a while, but the reports from testers > in the field have made me too nervous to push it into the upstream > kernel. > > I might push it upstream, but disable it by default, which would allow > for a wider test audience. Cou

Re: SATA status report updated

2005-08-12 Thread Luben Tuikov
On 08/12/05 01:09, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Things in SATA-land have been moving along recently, so I updated the > software status report: > > http://linux.yyz.us/sata/software-status.html Good write up. I like the simplicity of error handling. Thumbs up! Luben - To unsubscribe fro

Re: SATA status report updated

2005-08-12 Thread Luben Tuikov
On 08/12/05 01:09, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Things in SATA-land have been moving along recently, so I updated the > software status report: > > http://linux.yyz.us/sata/software-status.html > > Although I have not updated it in several weeks, folks may wish to refer > to the hardware status r

Re: SATA status report updated

2005-08-12 Thread Matthew Garrett
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Things in SATA-land have been moving along recently, so I updated the > software status report: > > http://linux.yyz.us/sata/software-status.html I couldn't see any reference to system-wide power management (ie, suspend/resume of machines with SA

Re: SATA status report updated

2005-08-11 Thread Jeff Garzik
Rob van Nieuwkerk wrote: On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 01:09:12 -0400 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Jeff, Things in SATA-land have been moving along recently, so I updated the software status report: http://linux.yyz.us/sata/software-status.html Is any progress made on SMART su

Re: SATA status report updated

2005-08-11 Thread Rob van Nieuwkerk
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 01:09:12 -0400 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Jeff, > Things in SATA-land have been moving along recently, so I updated the > software status report: > > http://linux.yyz.us/sata/software-status.html Is any progress made on SMART support ? I've been reading

SATA status report updated

2005-08-11 Thread Jeff Garzik
Things in SATA-land have been moving along recently, so I updated the software status report: http://linux.yyz.us/sata/software-status.html Although I have not updated it in several weeks, folks may wish to refer to the hardware status report as well: http://linux.yyz.us/sa