Re: Request for opinion: ufsutils

2019-02-13 Thread Pedro Sousa
Hello Greg k-h, On 2/13/2019 5:47 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 05:00:51PM +, Pedro Sousa wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 2/13/2019 9:30 AM, Avri Altman wrote: I can see the issue, there is no straightforward way of having "ufs-bsg" without a device attached? >>> Righ

Re: Request for opinion: ufsutils

2019-02-13 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 05:00:51PM +, Pedro Sousa wrote: > Hi, > > On 2/13/2019 9:30 AM, Avri Altman wrote: > >> > >> I can see the issue, there is no straightforward way of having "ufs-bsg" > >> without > >> a device attached? > > Right. > > > >> > >> This or any other method of talking with

Re: Request for opinion: ufsutils

2019-02-13 Thread Pedro Sousa
Hi, On 2/13/2019 9:30 AM, Avri Altman wrote: >> >> I can see the issue, there is no straightforward way of having "ufs-bsg" >> without >> a device attached? > Right. > >> >> This or any other method of talking with UniPro and MPhy layers when there >> is no >> device are necessary for us. Do you

RE: Request for opinion: ufsutils

2019-02-13 Thread Avri Altman
> > I can see the issue, there is no straightforward way of having "ufs-bsg" > without > a device attached? Right. > > This or any other method of talking with UniPro and MPhy layers when there > is no > device are necessary for us. Do you see some good way of doing this? I don't really know. If

Re: Request for opinion: ufsutils

2019-02-12 Thread Pedro Sousa
Hi, On 2/12/2019 10:59 AM, Avri Altman wrote: > Hi, > >> >> That's very good news! Do you already have any date to publish? > It should be sometime any day now. We will issue a formal notice of course. > >> Can we contribute in any way? > It's going to be an open-source, located in WD's github

RE: Request for opinion: ufsutils

2019-02-12 Thread Avri Altman
Hi, > > That's very good news! Do you already have any date to publish? It should be sometime any day now. We will issue a formal notice of course. > Can we contribute in any way? It's going to be an open-source, located in WD's github. Contributions are welcome. > > I have noticed that ufs_

Re: Request for opinion: ufsutils

2019-02-12 Thread Pedro Sousa
Hello Avri, On 2/11/2019 8:59 PM, Avri Altman wrote: > Hello Pedro, > >> >> Hello everyone, >> >> We are planning to build an open source tool for UFS, (let's name it >> "ufsutils"). The idea is to interact with the ufs driver for debug and test >> purposes. For us it would be useful for scenario

Re: Request for opinion: ufsutils

2019-02-11 Thread Alim Akhtar
On 12/02/19 2:29 AM, Avri Altman wrote: > Hello Pedro, > >> >> Hello everyone, >> >> We are planning to build an open source tool for UFS, (let's name it >> "ufsutils"). The idea is to interact with the ufs driver for debug and test >> purposes. For us it would be useful for scenarios like brin

RE: Request for opinion: ufsutils

2019-02-11 Thread Avri Altman
Hello Pedro, > > Hello everyone, > > We are planning to build an open source tool for UFS, (let's name it > "ufsutils"). The idea is to interact with the ufs driver for debug and test > purposes. For us it would be useful for scenarios like bring up of new > hardware, > debug while adding new fe

Request for opinion: ufsutils

2019-02-11 Thread Pedro Sousa
Hello everyone, We are planning to build an open source tool for UFS, (let's name it "ufsutils"). The idea is to interact with the ufs driver for debug and test purposes. For us it would be useful for scenarios like bring up of new hardware, debug while adding new features, force specific conditio