Re: xcopy testing with ddpt

2013-10-07 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 00:07 +0100, Chris Boot wrote: > On 07/10/2013 23:38, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 15:18 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > >> On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 06:03 +0200, Thomas Glanzmann wrote: > >>> Hello Doug, > >>> > >>> * Douglas Gilbert [2013-10-07 0

Re: xcopy testing with ddpt

2013-10-07 Thread Chris Boot
On 07/10/2013 23:38, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 15:18 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: >> On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 06:03 +0200, Thomas Glanzmann wrote: >>> Hello Doug, >>> >>> * Douglas Gilbert [2013-10-07 00:58]: Great, another one working. >> >> (CC'ing Hannes) >>

Re: xcopy testing with ddpt

2013-10-07 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 15:18 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 06:03 +0200, Thomas Glanzmann wrote: > > Hello Doug, > > > > * Douglas Gilbert [2013-10-07 00:58]: > > > Great, another one working. > > (CC'ing Hannes) > > > > BTW list_id=0 has a special meaning in some co

Re: xcopy testing with ddpt

2013-10-07 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 06:03 +0200, Thomas Glanzmann wrote: > Hello Doug, > > * Douglas Gilbert [2013-10-07 00:58]: > > Great, another one working. (CC'ing Hannes) > > BTW list_id=0 has a special meaning in some context > > (buried deep in T10 documents: spc4r36j.pdf). That is > > probably why H

Re: xcopy testing with ddpt

2013-10-06 Thread Thomas Glanzmann
Hello Doug, * Douglas Gilbert [2013-10-07 00:58]: > Great, another one working. yes. :-) > So this saniq/HP/lefthand system does not support fetching > the xcopy operating parameters, which will cause sg_xcopy > and ddpt to give up. These could be defaulted to something > sane and then use thos