2015.Szeptember 30.(Sze) 18:44 időpontban Christoph Hellwig ezt írta:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:43:28AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
>> OK, post a compilable version of the patch and lets get the reporter to
>> try it out. Not resurrecting esoteric flags suits me.
No WARNINGs upon reboot usin
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:43:28AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> OK, post a compilable version of the patch and lets get the reporter to
> try it out. Not resurrecting esoteric flags suits me.
Right here:
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/3w-9xxx.c b/drivers/scsi/3w-9xxx.c
index add419d..a56a7b2 10064
On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 09:41 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:36:24AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Are you sure? The init trace that kicked all this off still has
> > twa_init in it. I was figuring the most likely suspect is
> > twa_get_param().
>
> That one doesn
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:36:24AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> Are you sure? The init trace that kicked all this off still has
> twa_init in it. I was figuring the most likely suspect is
> twa_get_param().
That one doesnt set ->srb at all, but given that it's called before
any SCSI commands
On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 09:31 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:15:30AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > I already thought of this. Unfortunately, it fails if the internally
> > posted command is a single sector (the size of TW_MIN_SGL_LENGTH), which
> > is true for most
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:15:30AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> I already thought of this. Unfortunately, it fails if the internally
> posted command is a single sector (the size of TW_MIN_SGL_LENGTH), which
> is true for most of them.
Which internally posted command? All the usual suspects s
Hi Christoph,
[auto build test results on v4.3-rc3 -- if it's inappropriate base, please
ignore]
config: x86_64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
reproduce:
git checkout 6e392493504e88ec3b44596c22f08acf4eed11ee
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=x86_64
All error/w
On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 09:08 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to propose the following patch intead. It uses a helper
> to check the conditions for the copied commands, and also fixes another
> place to use it which uses a different and I think buggy check:
>
> This avoids t
Hi all,
I'd like to propose the following patch intead. It uses a helper
to check the conditions for the copied commands, and also fixes another
place to use it which uses a different and I think buggy check:
This avoids the usage of scsi_cmnd.SCp which I'd like to get rid of
mid-term.
diff --g
2015.Szeptember 29.(K) 20:33 időpontban James Bottomley ezt írta:
> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 20:25 +0200, "Tóth Attila" wrote:
>> 2015.Szeptember 29.(K) 20:02 időpontban James Bottomley ezt írta:
>> > On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 10:37 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 18:49 +0200, "T
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 20:25 +0200, "Tóth Attila" wrote:
> 2015.Szeptember 29.(K) 20:02 időpontban James Bottomley ezt írta:
> > On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 10:37 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 18:49 +0200, "Tóth Attila" wrote:
> >> > 2015.Szeptember 27.(V) 23:19 időpontban adam
2015.Szeptember 29.(K) 20:02 időpontban James Bottomley ezt írta:
> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 10:37 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 18:49 +0200, "Tóth Attila" wrote:
>> > 2015.Szeptember 27.(V) 23:19 időpontban adam radford ezt írta:
>> > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 4:56 AM, "Tóth
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 10:37 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 18:49 +0200, "Tóth Attila" wrote:
> > 2015.Szeptember 27.(V) 23:19 időpontban adam radford ezt írta:
> > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 4:56 AM, "Tóth Attila"
> > > wrote:
> > >> Here is a current trace I see after bootin
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 18:49 +0200, "Tóth Attila" wrote:
> 2015.Szeptember 27.(V) 23:19 időpontban adam radford ezt írta:
> > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 4:56 AM, "Tóth Attila"
> > wrote:
> >> Here is a current trace I see after booting that kernel:
> >> [ cut here ]
> >> WARNIN
2015.Szeptember 27.(V) 23:19 időpontban adam radford ezt írta:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 4:56 AM, "Tóth Attila"
> wrote:
>> Here is a current trace I see after booting that kernel:
>> [ cut here ]
>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c:3214
>> intel_unmap+
2015.Szeptember 27.(V) 23:19 időpontban adam radford ezt írta:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 4:56 AM, "Tóth Attila" wrote:
>> The 3ware card is a 9650SE-12ML running in a Asus Z8PE-D12X motherboard.
>>
>> I don't know the exact command I have to type to get a meaningful
output for addr2line...
>>
>> P
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 4:56 AM, "Tóth Attila" wrote:
> After an unsuccessful attempt to contact linuxr...@lsi.com, I'm trying to
> seek assistance on this list.
>
> I've been seeing WARNINGs upon boot for a while now, without any obvious
> symptoms. I got some advice to report it upstream on the
17 matches
Mail list logo
