Re: dm-multipath test scripts

2016-02-24 Thread Mike Snitzer
On Thu, Feb 18 2016 at 7:33pm -0500, Junichi Nomura wrote: > Hi Mike, > > On 02/19/16 02:17, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > > Taking a step back: > > These scripts don't belong in Documentation/device-mapper/mptest/ (or > > anywhere in the kernel tree for that matter). > > > > I'd really prefer it i

Re: why is blk-mq requeue foricbly kicking stopped queues? [was: Re: dm-multipath test scripts]

2016-02-22 Thread Mike Snitzer
On Mon, Feb 22 2016 at 8:34pm -0500, Junichi Nomura wrote: > On 02/23/16 00:09, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > I should note that I applied this patch for 4.6: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=dm-4.6&id=7db905b3d4294e5db4c2938fb7d0e5ba4bd798d6 > > >

Re: why is blk-mq requeue foricbly kicking stopped queues? [was: Re: dm-multipath test scripts]

2016-02-22 Thread Junichi Nomura
On 02/23/16 00:09, Mike Snitzer wrote: > I should note that I applied this patch for 4.6: > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=dm-4.6&id=7db905b3d4294e5db4c2938fb7d0e5ba4bd798d6 > > (but it was purely a fallout of code-review, and looking at the nvme'

why is blk-mq requeue foricbly kicking stopped queues? [was: Re: dm-multipath test scripts]

2016-02-22 Thread Mike Snitzer
On Mon, Feb 22 2016 at 4:51am -0500, Junichi Nomura wrote: > On 02/20/16 15:12, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 19 2016 at 2:42pm -0500, Mike Snitzer > > wrote: > >> Have you been running with blk-mq? > >> Either by setting CONFIG_DM_MQ_DEFAULT or: > >> echo Y > /sys/module/dm_mod/paramet

Re: dm-multipath test scripts

2016-02-22 Thread Junichi Nomura
On 02/20/16 15:12, Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19 2016 at 2:42pm -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: >> Have you been running with blk-mq? >> Either by setting CONFIG_DM_MQ_DEFAULT or: >> echo Y > /sys/module/dm_mod/parameters/use_blk_mq >> >> I'm seeing test_02_sdev_delete fail with blk-mq enabled.

Re: dm-multipath test scripts

2016-02-20 Thread Mike Snitzer
On Sat, Feb 20 2016 at 4:42am -0500, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 02/20/2016 07:12 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > >On Fri, Feb 19 2016 at 2:42pm -0500, > >Mike Snitzer wrote: > > > >>On Fri, Feb 19 2016 at 3:37am -0500, > >>Junichi Nomura wrote: > >> > >>>On 02/19/16 09:33, Nomura Junichi wrote: >

Re: dm-multipath test scripts

2016-02-20 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 02/20/2016 07:12 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote: On Fri, Feb 19 2016 at 2:42pm -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: On Fri, Feb 19 2016 at 3:37am -0500, Junichi Nomura wrote: On 02/19/16 09:33, Nomura Junichi wrote: On 02/19/16 02:17, Mike Snitzer wrote: What is the last kernel version that your scrip

Re: dm-multipath test scripts

2016-02-19 Thread Mike Snitzer
On Fri, Feb 19 2016 at 2:42pm -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19 2016 at 3:37am -0500, > Junichi Nomura wrote: > > > On 02/19/16 09:33, Nomura Junichi wrote: > > > On 02/19/16 02:17, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > >> What is the last kernel version that your scripts have worked on? > > > >

Re: dm-multipath test scripts

2016-02-19 Thread Mike Snitzer
On Fri, Feb 19 2016 at 3:37am -0500, Junichi Nomura wrote: > On 02/19/16 09:33, Nomura Junichi wrote: > > On 02/19/16 02:17, Mike Snitzer wrote: > >> What is the last kernel version that your scripts have worked on? > > > > v4.4 worked fine. I'll check with v4.5-rc4 when I get a machine. > > v

Re: dm-multipath test scripts

2016-02-19 Thread Junichi Nomura
On 02/19/16 09:33, Nomura Junichi wrote: > On 02/19/16 02:17, Mike Snitzer wrote: >> What is the last kernel version that your scripts have worked on? > > v4.4 worked fine. I'll check with v4.5-rc4 when I get a machine. v4.5-rc4 works fine, too. So if all tests fail for you, it might be due to d

Re: dm-multipath test scripts

2016-02-18 Thread Junichi Nomura
Hi Mike, On 02/19/16 02:17, Mike Snitzer wrote: > But unfortunately I cannot get either the scsidebug or tcmloop mode to > run against v4.5-rc4 > > For tcmloop, targetcli fails with: > "Could not create ISCSIFabricModule in configFS." Hmm, it sounds like there's unnecessary dependency in targetc

Re: dm-multipath test scripts

2016-02-18 Thread Mike Snitzer
On Wed, Oct 07 2015 at 1:39am -0400, Junichi Nomura wrote: > This is a set of scripts for kernel-side dm-multipath testing. Current > set of scripts are stress testing of extreme situation and its coverage > is limited. But recently found dm-mpath regressions should be detectable > with this. I

Re: dm-multipath test scripts

2015-11-14 Thread Mike Snitzer
On Fri, Nov 13 2015 at 5:55am -0500, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 05:39 +, Junichi Nomura wrote: > > This is a set of scripts for kernel-side dm-multipath testing. > > Current > > set of scripts are stress testing of extreme situation and its > > coverage > > is limited.

Re: dm-multipath test scripts

2015-11-13 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 05:39 +, Junichi Nomura wrote: > This is a set of scripts for kernel-side dm-multipath testing. > Current > set of scripts are stress testing of extreme situation and its > coverage > is limited. But recently found dm-mpath regressions should be > detectable > with this. I

Re: dm-multipath test scripts

2015-10-08 Thread Junichi Nomura
On 10/07/15 16:31, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 05:39 +, Junichi Nomura wrote: >> This is a set of scripts for kernel-side dm-multipath testing. >> Current >> set of scripts are stress testing of extreme situation and its >> coverage >> is limited. But recently found dm-mpa

Re: dm-multipath test scripts

2015-10-07 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 05:39 +, Junichi Nomura wrote: > This is a set of scripts for kernel-side dm-multipath testing. > Current > set of scripts are stress testing of extreme situation and its > coverage > is limited. But recently found dm-mpath regressions should be > detectable > with this. I