> > Bisection (on PA-RISC) points to:
> >
> > 71e75c97f97a9645d25fbf3d8e4165a558f18747 is the first bad commit
> > commit 71e75c97f97a9645d25fbf3d8e4165a558f18747
> > Author: Christoph Hellwig
> > Date: Fri Apr 11 19:07:01 2014 +0200
> >
> > scsi: convert device_busy to atomic_t
>
> That'
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 03:37:18PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 23:17 +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> > Bisection (on PA-RISC) points to:
> >
> > 71e75c97f97a9645d25fbf3d8e4165a558f18747 is the first bad commit
> > commit 71e75c97f97a9645d25fbf3d8e4165a558f18747
> > Aut
On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 23:17 +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:47:35AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 17:37 +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 14:25 +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > > > > 3.16 scsi worked fine, 3.17-rc1 misbe
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:17:48PM +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:47:35AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 17:37 +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 14:25 +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > > > > 3.16 scsi worked fine, 3.17-rc
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:47:35AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 17:37 +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 14:25 +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > > > 3.16 scsi worked fine, 3.17-rc1 misbehaves on 3 of my sparc64 test
> > > > machines. E220R and E420R are
On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 17:37 +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 14:25 +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > > 3.16 scsi worked fine, 3.17-rc1 misbehaves on 3 of my sparc64 test
> > > machines. E220R and E420R are with onboard 5c3875, V210 is with onboarc
> > > 53c1010 and all behave the s
> On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 14:25 +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > 3.16 scsi worked fine, 3.17-rc1 misbehaves on 3 of my sparc64 test
> > machines. E220R and E420R are with onboard 5c3875, V210 is with onboarc
> > 53c1010 and all behave the same. Any ideas whre to dig deeper? bisection
> > might be non
> > 3.16 scsi worked fine, 3.17-rc1 misbehaves on 3 of my sparc64 test
> > machines. E220R and E420R are with onboard 5c3875, V210 is with onboarc
> > 53c1010 and all behave the same. Any ideas whre to dig deeper? bisection
> > might be nontrivial, because of sparc64 changes that are OK on 3.17-
On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 14:25 +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
> 3.16 scsi worked fine, 3.17-rc1 misbehaves on 3 of my sparc64 test
> machines. E220R and E420R are with onboard 5c3875, V210 is with onboarc
> 53c1010 and all behave the same. Any ideas whre to dig deeper? bisection
> might be nontrivial, b
9 matches
Mail list logo