Re: Request for opinion: ufsutils

2019-02-13 Thread Pedro Sousa
Hello Greg k-h, On 2/13/2019 5:47 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 05:00:51PM +, Pedro Sousa wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 2/13/2019 9:30 AM, Avri Altman wrote: I can see the issue, there is no straightforward way of having "ufs-bsg" without a device attached? >>> Righ

Re: Request for opinion: ufsutils

2019-02-13 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 05:00:51PM +, Pedro Sousa wrote: > Hi, > > On 2/13/2019 9:30 AM, Avri Altman wrote: > >> > >> I can see the issue, there is no straightforward way of having "ufs-bsg" > >> without > >> a device attached? > > Right. > > > >> > >> This or any other method of talking with

Re: Request for opinion: ufsutils

2019-02-13 Thread Pedro Sousa
Hi, On 2/13/2019 9:30 AM, Avri Altman wrote: >> >> I can see the issue, there is no straightforward way of having "ufs-bsg" >> without >> a device attached? > Right. > >> >> This or any other method of talking with UniPro and MPhy layers when there >> is no >> device are necessary for us. Do you

RE: Request for opinion: ufsutils

2019-02-13 Thread Avri Altman
> > I can see the issue, there is no straightforward way of having "ufs-bsg" > without > a device attached? Right. > > This or any other method of talking with UniPro and MPhy layers when there > is no > device are necessary for us. Do you see some good way of doing this? I don't really know. If

Re: Request for opinion: ufsutils

2019-02-12 Thread Pedro Sousa
Hi, On 2/12/2019 10:59 AM, Avri Altman wrote: > Hi, > >> >> That's very good news! Do you already have any date to publish? > It should be sometime any day now. We will issue a formal notice of course. > >> Can we contribute in any way? > It's going to be an open-source, located in WD's github

RE: Request for opinion: ufsutils

2019-02-12 Thread Avri Altman
Hi, > > That's very good news! Do you already have any date to publish? It should be sometime any day now. We will issue a formal notice of course. > Can we contribute in any way? It's going to be an open-source, located in WD's github. Contributions are welcome. > > I have noticed that ufs_

Re: Request for opinion: ufsutils

2019-02-12 Thread Pedro Sousa
Hello Avri, On 2/11/2019 8:59 PM, Avri Altman wrote: > Hello Pedro, > >> >> Hello everyone, >> >> We are planning to build an open source tool for UFS, (let's name it >> "ufsutils"). The idea is to interact with the ufs driver for debug and test >> purposes. For us it would be useful for scenario

Re: Request for opinion: ufsutils

2019-02-11 Thread Alim Akhtar
On 12/02/19 2:29 AM, Avri Altman wrote: > Hello Pedro, > >> >> Hello everyone, >> >> We are planning to build an open source tool for UFS, (let's name it >> "ufsutils"). The idea is to interact with the ufs driver for debug and test >> purposes. For us it would be useful for scenarios like brin

RE: Request for opinion: ufsutils

2019-02-11 Thread Avri Altman
Hello Pedro, > > Hello everyone, > > We are planning to build an open source tool for UFS, (let's name it > "ufsutils"). The idea is to interact with the ufs driver for debug and test > purposes. For us it would be useful for scenarios like bring up of new > hardware, > debug while adding new fe