Re: Fwd: Multi tape problems with cpio

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Tape Help wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:50:32 +0200 (EET), Kai Makisara ... > > I will forward this analysis (with a preface) to the cpio maintainers. > > > > -- > > Kai > > > > Are the cpio maintainers on a list? > I would like to monitor the status of this issue. > I s

Re: Fwd: Multi tape problems with cpio

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:50:32 +0200 (EET), Kai Makisara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Tape Help wrote: > > > Ok, I have the debug info, with comments where needed. > > Thanks alot! > > > ... > > # find home -depth|cpio -o --format=newc --block-size=128 -F /dev/st0 > > 14:24:48

Re: Fwd: Multi tape problems with cpio

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Tape Help wrote: > Ok, I have the debug info, with comments where needed. > Thanks alot! > ... > # find home -depth|cpio -o --format=newc --block-size=128 -F /dev/st0 > 14:24:48 kernel: st0: Block limits 1 - 16777215 bytes. > 14:24:48 kernel: st0: Mode sense. Length 11, mediu

Re: Fwd: Multi tape problems with cpio

Ok, I have the debug info, with comments where needed. Thanks alot! #Unload then loaded st, without a reboot 10:37:10 kernel: st: Unloaded. 10:37:37 kernel: st: Version 20040102, bufsize 32768, max init. bufs 4, s/g segs 16 10:37:37 kernel: Attached scsi tape st0 at scsi1, channel 0, id 2, lun 0 1

Re: Fwd: Multi tape problems with cpio

On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 20:47:55 +0200 (EET), Kai Makisara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Tape Help wrote: > > > No one on linux-tape has responded. I think that list is dead. > > Can anyone help? > > > linux-tape may not be dead but you have to give us some time ;-) > > > Thanks

Re: Fwd: Multi tape problems with cpio

On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Tape Help wrote: > No one on linux-tape has responded. I think that list is dead. > Can anyone help? > linux-tape may not be dead but you have to give us some time ;-) > Thanks. > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Tape Help <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri,