James Smart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't believe this is a valid fix. This is yet another case
> of the reuse-after-free issues on sdevs. The real issue is the
> deleted sdev isn't truly getting deleted due to references, and
> we're deadlocked trying to allocate a new one while the old o
I don't believe this is a valid fix. This is yet another case
of the reuse-after-free issues on sdevs. The real issue is the
deleted sdev isn't truly getting deleted due to references, and
we're deadlocked trying to allocate a new one while the old one
is outstanding. This fix just jumps over thin
2 matches
Mail list logo
