Re: 2.6.24-rc5: tape drive not responding

2007-12-18 Thread Kai Makisara
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 13:43 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:02:02 -0500 > > "John Stoffel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Just to confirm, the propsed patch to st.c fixes the issue with > > > 2.6.24-rc5 as well a

Re: 2.6.24-rc5: tape drive not responding

2007-12-17 Thread John Stoffel
> "James" == James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: James> On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 13:43 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:02:02 -0500 >> "John Stoffel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > >> > Just to confirm, the propsed patch to st.c fixes the issue with >> > 2.6.24-

Re: 2.6.24-rc5: tape drive not responding

2007-12-17 Thread Jean-Louis Dupond
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=119770154127770&w=2 There is the patch for st.c Andrew Morton schreef: On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:02:02 -0500 "John Stoffel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just to confirm, the propsed patch to st.c fixes the issue with 2.6.24-rc5 as well at 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 with access

Re: 2.6.24-rc5: tape drive not responding

2007-12-17 Thread James Bottomley
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 13:43 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:02:02 -0500 > "John Stoffel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Just to confirm, the propsed patch to st.c fixes the issue with > > 2.6.24-rc5 as well at 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 with access to my DLT tape > > drives. > >

Re: 2.6.24-rc5: tape drive not responding

2007-12-17 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:02:02 -0500 "John Stoffel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just to confirm, the propsed patch to st.c fixes the issue with > 2.6.24-rc5 as well at 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 with access to my DLT tape > drives. err, what patch to st.c? So it seems that 2.6.24 (and presumably 2.6.23?)

Re: 2.6.24-rc5: tape drive not responding

2007-12-17 Thread John Stoffel
Just to confirm, the propsed patch to st.c fixes the issue with 2.6.24-rc5 as well at 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 with access to my DLT tape drives. Thanks! John - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http:/

Re: 2.6.24-rc5: tape drive not responding

2007-12-17 Thread John Stoffel
> "Andrew" == Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andrew> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:25:51 +0900 FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:05:51 -0500 >> "John Stoffel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > [ 273.382057] sd 12:0:0:3: Attached scsi generic sg13 ty

Re: 2.6.24-rc5: tape drive not responding

2007-12-17 Thread John Stoffel
> "Andrew" == Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andrew> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:25:51 +0900 FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:05:51 -0500 >> "John Stoffel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > [ 215.007701] sym1: SCSI parity error detected: SCR1=1 DBC

Re: 2.6.24-rc5: tape drive not responding

2007-12-17 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:25:51 +0900 FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:05:51 -0500 > "John Stoffel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [ 215.007701] sym1: SCSI parity error detected: SCR1=1 DBC=1128 SBCL=ae > > [ 215.008145] sym1: SCSI parity error detected: SC

Re: 2.6.24-rc5: tape drive not responding

2007-12-16 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:05:51 -0500 "John Stoffel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ 215.007701] sym1: SCSI parity error detected: SCR1=1 DBC=1128 SBCL=ae > [ 215.008145] sym1: SCSI parity error detected: SCR1=1 DBC=1128 SBCL=ae > [ 215.008678] sym1: SCSI parity error detected: SCR1=1 DBC=1

Re: 2.6.24-rc5: tape drive not responding

2007-12-16 Thread John Stoffel
Hi, This looks to be a regression between 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc5, I'll try to bi-sect this and report more on it. Basically, when I bootup, I get a ton of errors in the dmesg log along the lines of: [ 215.007701] sym1: SCSI parity error detected: SCR1=1 DBC=1128 SBCL=ae [ 215.008145] sym1: