On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> > For one thing, you've using retries to control both an outer loop and
> > an inner loop -- meaning the total number of attempts could be on the
> > order of retries**2.
>
> Sort of; however, there should only really be one cc/ua before the TUR
> go
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 15:02 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > Actually, the night train is a good place to do coding. I know this
> > compiles, but could someone check it out? It's the form I think we
> > should do, since the ASC/ASCQ codes for esoteric
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> Actually, the night train is a good place to do coding. I know this
> compiles, but could someone check it out? It's the form I think we
> should do, since the ASC/ASCQ codes for esoteric conditions which we
> might eventually check for are different
On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 16:25 +0200, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 15:18 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Guys, I have this marked as needed-in-2.6.24?
>
> Could you wait on this a bit ... since it's such an old bug. The code
> in question needs to be reworked (as the comment says).
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 15:18 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Guys, I have this marked as needed-in-2.6.24?
>
> Could you wait on this a bit ... since it's such an old bug. The code
> in question needs to be reworked (as the comment says). I think the
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 15:18 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Guys, I have this marked as needed-in-2.6.24?
Could you wait on this a bit ... since it's such an old bug. The code
in question needs to be reworked (as the comment says). I think the
best rework is to have the caller pass in an optional
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Guys, I have this marked as needed-in-2.6.24?
> From: Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Taken from http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8904
>
> An updated (by Albert, I assume) version of the fourteen-month-old patch here:
>
> http://marc.inf
Andrew Morton wrote:
> From: Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Taken from http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8904
>
> An updated (by Albert, I assume) version of the fourteen-month-old patch here:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=115412002912837&w=2
>
> Apparently fixes the bug d
8 matches
Mail list logo
