Re: [PATCHv4 0/6] Support 64-bit LUNs

2014-06-11 Thread Douglas Gilbert
On 14-06-11 02:53 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: On 06/11/14 08:34, Hannes Reinecke wrote: On 06/10/2014 07:58 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: Many SCSI LLD's use int_to_scsilun() in the hot path (queuecommand()). This patch series makes the int_to_scsilun() function slightly more expensive. Has it been

Re: [PATCHv4 0/6] Support 64-bit LUNs

2014-06-10 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 06/11/14 08:34, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 06/10/2014 07:58 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> Many SCSI LLD's use int_to_scsilun() in the hot path (queuecommand()). >> This patch series makes the int_to_scsilun() function slightly more >> expensive. Has it been considered to cache the result of int

Re: [PATCHv4 0/6] Support 64-bit LUNs

2014-06-10 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 06/10/2014 07:58 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: On 06/03/14 10:58, Hannes Reinecke wrote: this patchset updates the SCSI stack to support full 64-bit LUNs. The first patch is a simple fix; the next patch updates the sequential scan logic to be compliant with SPC. The third patch addresses a firmw

Re: [PATCHv4 0/6] Support 64-bit LUNs

2014-06-10 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 06/03/14 10:58, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > this patchset updates the SCSI stack to support full 64-bit LUNs. > The first patch is a simple fix; the next patch updates > the sequential scan logic to be compliant with SPC. > The third patch addresses a firmware issue with earlier > qla2xxx HBAs. > T