That's good to know. We have a fair amount of existing strings that are
split, so I don't want to retrofit those. But, on future submits, we'll
keep the string on a single line.
Thanks
-- james
On 5/27/2015 5:32 PM, Sebastian Herbszt wrote:
James Smart wrote:
Sebastian,
Re: more than 1 s
James Smart wrote:
> Sebastian,
>
> Re: more than 1 space between a type declaration and a variable name - I
> do not believe that's a hard requirement. It fully passes checkpatch.
> Yes, consistent style use (aligning all variable names at same offset,
> or always 1) would be good - but code h
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 09:30 -0400, James Smart wrote:
> Sebastian,
>
> Re: more than 1 space between a type declaration and a variable name - I
> do not believe that's a hard requirement. It fully passes checkpatch.
> Yes, consistent style use (aligning all variable names at same offset,
> or a
Sebastian,
Re: more than 1 space between a type declaration and a variable name - I
do not believe that's a hard requirement. It fully passes checkpatch.
Yes, consistent style use (aligning all variable names at same offset,
or always 1) would be good - but code has been there so long with
al
James Smart wrote:
>
> Fix rport leak.
>
> Correct locking and refcounting in tracking our rports
>
> Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy
> Signed-off-by: James Smart
> ---
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_disc.h| 4 +-
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c | 12 +++-
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c |
5 matches
Mail list logo
