On 01/22/2013 05:13 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 January 2013 10:25:31 Aaron Lu wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 03:56:43PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>>> On Monday 21 January 2013 17:11:04 Aaron Lu wrote:
It is not easy for the OS to tell if the drive is being used or not
s
On Tuesday 22 January 2013 10:25:31 Aaron Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 03:56:43PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > On Monday 21 January 2013 17:11:04 Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > It is not easy for the OS to tell if the drive is being used or not
> > > sometimes
> > >
> > > Alan has reminded me it
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 03:56:43PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Monday 21 January 2013 17:11:04 Aaron Lu wrote:
> > It is not easy for the OS to tell if the drive is being used or not
> > sometimes
> >
> > Alan has reminded me it is possible for an app to open the block device
> > file(/dev/s
On Monday 21 January 2013 17:11:04 Aaron Lu wrote:
> It is not easy for the OS to tell if the drive is being used or not
> sometimes
>
> Alan has reminded me it is possible for an app to open the block device
> file(/dev/sr0), issue a command(play audio), then close the device file.
> From the OS
On 01/20/2013 02:46 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
Then we indeed have a problem. But I didn't find any such app in
Fedora's repo or by searching the internet.
http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/2392183/dir/redhat_5.x/com/cdp-0.33-10.i386.rpm.html
Now tha
Hi Julian,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 07:55:20PM +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 02:31:50PM +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
> >> Hi Alan,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Alan Stern
> >> wrote:
> >> > O
Hi Aaron,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 02:31:50PM +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Alan Stern
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, 19 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
>> >> > closed. Do we want to drop support for that kind
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 02:31:50PM +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
> >> > closed. Do we want to drop support for that kind of behavior?
> >>
> >> I don't think we should drop such support.
> >>
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 01:46:15PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
>
> > > What happens if you're not running a desktop graphical environment, so
> > > gvfs doesn't mount the disc? Basically, I'm worried that the drive may
> > > remain suspended after sr_open() ret
Hi Alan,
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
>> > closed. Do we want to drop support for that kind of behavior?
>>
>> I don't think we should drop such support.
>> And the safest way to avoid such break is we refine the suspend
>> condition f
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > What happens if you're not running a desktop graphical environment, so
> > gvfs doesn't mount the disc? Basically, I'm worried that the drive may
> > remain suspended after sr_open() returns.
>
> Tried on my notebook with a normal ODD, using mplayer under
On 01/18/2013 11:24 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
Aaron, have you checked whether this patch works okay when you play a
track on an audio-only CD on the computer? The block interface looks
okay but I'm not sure about the cdrom_device interface.
Just verified it w
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > Aaron, have you checked whether this patch works okay when you play a
> > track on an audio-only CD on the computer? The block interface looks
> > okay but I'm not sure about the cdrom_device interface.
>
> Just verified it works OK with the whole patchs
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:31:31AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:20 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > This patch adds runtime pm support for sr.
> > >
> > > It did this by increasing the runtime usage_count of the device when:
> >
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:20 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > This patch adds runtime pm support for sr.
> >
> > It did this by increasing the runtime usage_count of the device when:
> > - its block device is opened;
> > - the events checking is to run.
> >
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:20 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> This patch adds runtime pm support for sr.
>
> It did this by increasing the runtime usage_count of the device when:
> - its block device is opened;
> - the events checking is to run.
>
> And decreasing the runtime usage_count of the device whe
16 matches
Mail list logo
