Re: [PATCH RFC] increase ST_MAX_TAPES from 128 to 1024

2012-08-17 Thread Jeff Mahoney
The preallocation of cdevs is also addressed in my patch set. I'll send it out as soon as I'm at my notebook again. -Jeff -- Jeff Mahoney (apologies for the top post -- from my mobile) On Aug 17, 2012, at 4:58 PM, "Rob Evers " wrote: > On 08/17/2012 11:37 AM, James Bottomley wrote: >> On Fri

Re: [PATCH RFC] increase ST_MAX_TAPES from 128 to 1024

2012-08-17 Thread Rob Evers
On 08/17/2012 11:37 AM, James Bottomley wrote: On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 10:50 -0400, Rob Evers wrote: Wondering if this would be an acceptable interim solution to increasing the limit on the number of tape drives while http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=134212042809524&w=2 gets sorted out. Signed-of

Re: [PATCH RFC] increase ST_MAX_TAPES from 128 to 1024

2012-08-17 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 10:50 -0400, Rob Evers wrote: > Wondering if this would be an acceptable interim solution > to increasing the limit on the number of tape drives > while http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=134212042809524&w=2 > gets sorted out. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Evers > --- > drivers/scsi

Re: [PATCH RFC] increase ST_MAX_TAPES from 128 to 1024

2012-08-17 Thread Jeff Mahoney
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 8/17/12 10:50 AM, Rob Evers wrote: > Wondering if this would be an acceptable interim solution to > increasing the limit on the number of tape drives while > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=134212042809524&w=2 gets sorted > out. I have the updated