On 06/19/2015 08:49 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:43:41AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> Strictly speaking SPC doesn't require READ CAPACITY and friends
>> to be supported while in the port is in standby.
>
> But it does allow it. We should always aim to implement th
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:43:41AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Strictly speaking SPC doesn't require READ CAPACITY and friends
> to be supported while in the port is in standby.
But it does allow it. We should always aim to implement the best
possible behavior instead of aiming for the worst.
On 06/18/2015 01:40 PM, Chris Boot wrote:
> On 18/06/15 10:43, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> Strictly speaking SPC doesn't require READ CAPACITY and friends
>> to be supported while in the port is in standby.
>
> Hi Hannes,
>
> I'd really rather this didn't go away. Yes, strictly speaking SPC
> doesn
On 18/06/15 10:43, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Strictly speaking SPC doesn't require READ CAPACITY and friends
> to be supported while in the port is in standby.
Hi Hannes,
I'd really rather this didn't go away. Yes, strictly speaking SPC
doesn't require these commands but Linux in practice does, an
4 matches
Mail list logo