Mike,
On 7/11/17 02:26, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 07/10/2017 12:36 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> Nicholas, Mike,
>>
>> On 7/7/17 15:05, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
>>> Everything including MNC's #1-6 and your #1-2 be pushed to
>>> target-pending/for-next shortly.
>>>
>>> Please use this as your ba
On 07/10/2017 12:36 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> Nicholas, Mike,
>
> On 7/7/17 15:05, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
>> Everything including MNC's #1-6 and your #1-2 be pushed to
>> target-pending/for-next shortly.
>>
>> Please use this as your base for testing. :)
>
> I ran tests this morning with
Nicholas, Mike,
On 7/7/17 15:05, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> Everything including MNC's #1-6 and your #1-2 be pushed to
> target-pending/for-next shortly.
>
> Please use this as your base for testing. :)
I ran tests this morning with the latest target-pending/for-next branch.
I ran libzbc te
On 07/06/2017 11:50 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> Hey MNC & Co,
>
> On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 12:44 -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
>> On 06/28/2017 12:58 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>> If the user request handler completed the request with a CHECK CONDITION
>>> status, tcmu_handle_completion() copies
On 7/7/17 15:06, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
>>> My apologies. I have been busy with other things and could not get to that.
>>>
>
> Oh btw, I was talking to MNC wrt to his original patch series, and not
> yours. :)
Yes, I realized that after sending. Tired Friday afternoon here in
Japan. My
On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 23:05 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 14:14 +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> > Nicholas,
> >
> > On 7/7/17 13:50, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > > Hey MNC & Co,
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 12:44 -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> > >> On 06/28/20
On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 14:14 +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> Nicholas,
>
> On 7/7/17 13:50, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > Hey MNC & Co,
> >
> > On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 12:44 -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> >> On 06/28/2017 12:58 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> >>> If the user request handler completed t
Nicholas,
On 7/7/17 13:50, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> Hey MNC & Co,
>
> On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 12:44 -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
>> On 06/28/2017 12:58 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>> If the user request handler completed the request with a CHECK CONDITION
>>> status, tcmu_handle_completion() co
(Adding MNC CC')
On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 14:58 +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> If the user request handler completed the request with a CHECK CONDITION
> status, tcmu_handle_completion() copies the command entry sense data
> into the session request structure sense data. However, the sense data
> len
Hey MNC & Co,
On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 12:44 -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 06/28/2017 12:58 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> > If the user request handler completed the request with a CHECK CONDITION
> > status, tcmu_handle_completion() copies the command entry sense data
> > into the session request s
On 6/29/17 02:44, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 06/28/2017 12:58 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> If the user request handler completed the request with a CHECK CONDITION
>> status, tcmu_handle_completion() copies the command entry sense data
>> into the session request structure sense data. However, the
On 06/28/2017 12:58 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> If the user request handler completed the request with a CHECK CONDITION
> status, tcmu_handle_completion() copies the command entry sense data
> into the session request structure sense data. However, the sense data
> length indicated by the field sc
12 matches
Mail list logo
