On Tuesday 13 October 2015 13:44:26 John Garry wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just to be clear, are you saying that you would prefer hisi_sas_probe()
> and struct hisi_sas_driver to be relocated to hisi_sas_v1_hw.c?
Correct.
> I wanted to keep hisi_sas_v1_hw.c containing only code which accesses HW.
>
>
On 12/10/2015 19:46, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 12 October 2015 23:20:24 John Garry wrote:
@@ -387,6 +392,21 @@ static int hisi_sas_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
hisi_sas_init_add(hisi_hba);
+
+ rc = hw_init_v1_hw(hisi_hba);
+ if (rc)
+ go
On Monday 12 October 2015 23:20:24 John Garry wrote:
> @@ -387,6 +392,21 @@ static int hisi_sas_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> hisi_sas_init_add(hisi_hba);
> +
> + rc = hw_init_v1_hw(hisi_hba);
> + if (rc)
> + goto err_out_ha;
> +
> + r
3 matches
Mail list logo