On Fri, 7 June 2013 14:54:16 +0800, Ren Mingxin wrote:
> On 06/06/2013 05:43 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>
> This approach may not work for some LLDDs as you said, but I wonder
> whether SAS is applicable(whether there will be later patches for
> SAS).
We have tested a derived patch on SAS and it
On 06/07/2013 08:54 AM, Ren Mingxin wrote:
> Hi, Hannes:
>
> On 06/06/2013 05:43 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> this is the first step towards a new non-blocking
>> error handler. This patch implements a new command
>> timeout handler which will be sending command aborts
>> inline without engaging
Hi, Hannes:
On 06/06/2013 05:43 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
this is the first step towards a new non-blocking
error handler. This patch implements a new command
timeout handler which will be sending command aborts
inline without engaging SCSI EH.
In addition the commands will be returned directl
3 matches
Mail list logo