On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 02:20:28PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 13:56 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > That would work, or I can simply include a pointer to Stephen's patch in
> > > the tar
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 13:56 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
> wrote:
> >
> > That would work, or I can simply include a pointer to Stephen's patch in
> > the target-pending PULL request after the vhost API changes are merged
> > and Linus can a
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
wrote:
>
> That would work, or I can simply include a pointer to Stephen's patch in
> the target-pending PULL request after the vhost API changes are merged
> and Linus can apply himself..
Yes. That way I'll include it in the merge, and every
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 13:09 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 12:57 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 21:45 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:39:17AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 16:
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 12:57 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 21:45 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:39:17AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 16:02 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 a
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 22:35 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:39:17AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 16:02 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 09:52:17PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > Hi Michael,
> > > >
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 21:45 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:39:17AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 16:02 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 09:52:17PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > Hi Michael,
> > > >
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:39:17AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 16:02 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 09:52:17PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Michael,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:42:54 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> > >
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:39:17AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 16:02 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 09:52:17PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Michael,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:42:54 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> > >
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 16:02 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 09:52:17PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:42:54 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > So I see two options:
> > > - I go ahead with my changes and you
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:02:08 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> I don't see how that's possible.
> Here's a point you might have missed.
> Nicholas's patch isn't just introducing a merge conflict.
> It is also buggy.
Ah ha! Indeed that is a different kettle of fish. :-)
--
Chee
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 09:52:17PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:42:54 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> wrote:
> >
> > So I see two options:
> > - I go ahead with my changes and you with yours and let Linus resolve
> > the conflict. This means bisect buil
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:42:54 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> So I see two options:
> - I go ahead with my changes and you with yours and let Linus resolve
> the conflict. This means bisect build will be broken since the
> breakage will likely not be noticed until after the
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:05:12AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 16:30 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 02:26:16AM +, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > > From: Nicholas Bellinger
> > >
> > > Hi MST, MKP, Paolo & Co,
> > >
> > > Here is
Il 10/06/2014 09:07, Nicholas A. Bellinger ha scritto:
> OK, finally went over this, looks good to me:
>
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
>
> However, we really should stop making more changes
> before fixing ANY_LAYOUT in this driver.
>
> virtio 1.0 should be out soon and that makes ANY_LAYOUT
>
On Sun, 2014-06-08 at 19:05 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 02:26:16AM +, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > From: Nicholas Bellinger
> >
> > Hi MST, MKP, Paolo & Co,
> >
> > Here is the v2 patch series for adding T1O protection information (PI)
> > SGL passthrough s
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 16:30 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 02:26:16AM +, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > From: Nicholas Bellinger
> >
> > Hi MST, MKP, Paolo & Co,
> >
> > Here is the v2 patch series for adding T1O protection information (PI)
> > SGL passthrough s
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 02:26:16AM +, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> From: Nicholas Bellinger
>
> Hi MST, MKP, Paolo & Co,
>
> Here is the v2 patch series for adding T1O protection information (PI)
> SGL passthrough support between virtio-scsi LLD + vhost-scsi fabric
> endpoints.
>
> Follow
Il 08/06/2014 18:05, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
OK, finally went over this, looks good to me:
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
However, we really should stop making more changes
before fixing ANY_LAYOUT in this driver.
virtio 1.0 should be out soon and that makes ANY_LAYOUT
a required featur
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 02:26:16AM +, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> From: Nicholas Bellinger
>
> Hi MST, MKP, Paolo & Co,
>
> Here is the v2 patch series for adding T1O protection information (PI)
> SGL passthrough support between virtio-scsi LLD + vhost-scsi fabric
> endpoints.
>
> Follow
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 02:26:16AM +, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> From: Nicholas Bellinger
>
> Hi MST, MKP, Paolo & Co,
>
> Here is the v2 patch series for adding T1O protection information (PI)
> SGL passthrough support between virtio-scsi LLD + vhost-scsi fabric
> endpoints.
>
> Follow
Il 22/05/2014 04:26, Nicholas A. Bellinger ha scritto:
From: Nicholas Bellinger
Hi MST, MKP, Paolo & Co,
Here is the v2 patch series for adding T1O protection information (PI)
SGL passthrough support between virtio-scsi LLD + vhost-scsi fabric
endpoints.
Following MST's recommendation, it inc
22 matches
Mail list logo
