Il 07/12/2012 12:20, Kirill A. Shutemov ha scritto:
>> > Is this that much faster than scsi-debug? The discarding options surely
>> > can be added there.
> scsi_ram is about 9% faster (without fake_rw/throw_away_*) on my machine:
There are two main differences in the data path:
- scsi_debug uses
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:09:07AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 05/12/2012 17:45, Kirill A. Shutemov ha scritto:
> > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov"
> >
> > This driver is intended to run as fast as possible, hence the options to
> > discard writes and reads. It's designed to let us find latency i
Il 05/12/2012 17:45, Kirill A. Shutemov ha scritto:
> From: "Kirill A. Shutemov"
>
> This driver is intended to run as fast as possible, hence the options to
> discard writes and reads. It's designed to let us find latency issues
> elsewhere in the storage stack (eg filesystem, block layer, scsi
3 matches
Mail list logo