On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 10:07 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> The libsas error handler has two fairly fatal bugs
A bug in this one was picked up in testing. There's still a double
completion race from the time a task is aborted to the time the eh
actually starts. If the task returns in that interv
--- On Thu, 2/21/08, James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Look, Luben; I don't mind you making an arse of
> yourself on the mailing
> lists; that's about par for the course nowadays.
No, you just did in this thread by pretending to be any kind of
authority or have an expertise on how to fi
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 21:51 -0800, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> A similar change went into the SAS/SATL layer I support
> shortly after I posted the version which you forked off.
> The git date of the commit is: Tue Feb 7 22:14:54 2006 -0800.
Look, Luben; I don't mind you making an arse of yourself on th
A similar change went into the SAS/SATL layer I support
shortly after I posted the version which you forked off.
The git date of the commit is: Tue Feb 7 22:14:54 2006 -0800.
BTW, the problem you're "debugging" may require a protocol
trace and a sequencer update by Adaptec.
Luben
--- On Wed,
4 matches
Mail list logo
