Re: [GIT PULL] async scsi resume for 3.15

2014-04-11 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > This has been the biggest (by far) merge window so far, afaik. > Might as well take this too. Actually, I take that "by far" back. In fact it's not even the biggest one (yet). It looks like 3.10-rc1 was worse in number of commits, and v3.

Re: [GIT PULL] async scsi resume for 3.15

2014-04-11 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:20 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > > I also don't see this in linux-next, unless I'm not looking in the right > place, so it would be a bit of a risk adding it just before -rc1. .. but it sounds like you're not against it? I'll pull it - in the chaos that is 3.15-rc1, this

Re: [GIT PULL] async scsi resume for 3.15

2014-04-11 Thread Dan Williams
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:20 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 18:24 -0700, Dan Williams wrote: >> Hi Linus, >> >> James might still be in the process of sending this your way. However, >> given the proximity to -rc1, my reasoning for sending this directly is: >> >> 1/ It provid

Re: [GIT PULL] async scsi resume for 3.15

2014-04-11 Thread James Bottomley
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 18:24 -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > Hi Linus, > > James might still be in the process of sending this your way. However, > given the proximity to -rc1, my reasoning for sending this directly is: > > 1/ It provides a tangible speed up for a non-esoteric use case (laptop > res