On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 08:24:46PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> I just did a rebase for all drivers they patch and compile
> over current scsi-misc. Save one, qlogicpti.c, a fix will follow.
> (I keep stumbling over Matthew's patches ;)
At least this time I only deleted some code you were patching
On Tue, Sep 11 2007 at 23:23 +0300, Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here are more accessors patches. I have tried
> to find Maintainers of drivers but please help me if
> I missed any.
>
> After this there are 3 drivers left (I think)
> - gdth.c, pluto.c, seagate.c
> These I'll send only
James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 16:57 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Monday 17 September 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
Realistically (and I hate myself for saying this) libata-pata does
provide a much better alternative for the ATAPI devices. Is it j
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 16:57 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Monday 17 September 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> >> Realistically (and I hate myself for saying this) libata-pata does
> >> provide a much better alternative for the ATAPI devices. Is it just
> >> tim
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Monday 17 September 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
Realistically (and I hate myself for saying this) libata-pata does
provide a much better alternative for the ATAPI devices. Is it just
time to recognise the inevitable and kill ide-scsi?
Agreed, libata-pata i
On Monday 17 September 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 12:46 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > 0024 drivers/scsi/ide-scsi.c - Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > This reminds me that ide-scsi needs a real Maintainer, I don't have a
> > time to
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 12:46 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> 0024 drivers/scsi/ide-scsi.c - Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This reminds me that ide-scsi needs a real Maintainer, I don't have a
> time to
> closely follow-up SCSI changes...
Er, well, I thought it had
On Mon, Sep 17 2007 at 12:46 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 September 2007, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> Here are more accessors patches. I have tried
>> to find Maintainers of drivers but please help me if
>> I missed any.
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> 0010 dri
On Tuesday 11 September 2007, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Here are more accessors patches. I have tried
> to find Maintainers of drivers but please help me if
> I missed any.
[ ... ]
> 0010 drivers/scsi/eata_pio.c - Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ?
not me, according to MAINTAINTERS
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> [esp family] - Maciej W. Rozycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 0020 drivers/scsi/NCR53C9x.c drivers/scsi/NCR53C9x.h
> drivers/scsi/dec_esp.c drivers/scsi/oktagon_esp.c
> drivers/scsi/sun3x_esp.c
Not really, but I have suitable hardware and can test
On Tue, Sep 11 2007 at 23:50 +0300, "Cameron, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> drivers/block/cciss_scsi.c
Already done by Tomo
41ce639a1c50cb936f058f52f99f65740e3f550e
cciss: convert to use the data buffer accessors
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
t
Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Here are more accessors patches. I have tried
> to find Maintainers of drivers but please help me if
> I missed any.
The cciss tape drive code probably needs updating.
It's in drivers/block/cciss_scsi.c
-- steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "u
12 matches
Mail list logo
