RE: [PATCH 21/30] blk_end_request: changing cciss (take 4)

2007-12-12 Thread Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
> > > > Why is this removed? > > Sorry for the less explanation. > > Because it is done in __end_that_request_first() called from > blk_end_request(). > I'll add the explanation to the patch description when I > update the patch. > Thank you. I've Acked the patch. -- mikem - To unsubscribe from t

RE: [PATCH 21/30] blk_end_request: changing cciss (take 4)

2007-12-12 Thread Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
> -Original Message- > From: Kiyoshi Ueda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 4:50 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Miller, Mike (OS Dev)

Re: [PATCH 21/30] blk_end_request: changing cciss (take 4)

2007-12-12 Thread Kiyoshi Ueda
Hi Mike, On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:25:10 +, "Miller, Mike (OS Dev)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Index: 2.6.24-rc4/drivers/block/cciss.c > > === > > --- 2.6.24-rc4.orig/drivers/block/cciss.c > > +++ 2.6.24-rc4/drivers/block/cciss.

RE: [PATCH 21/30] blk_end_request: changing cciss (take 4)

2007-12-12 Thread Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
> > This patch converts cciss to use blk_end_request interfaces. > Related 'uptodate' arguments are converted to 'error'. > > cciss is a little bit different from "normal" drivers. > cciss directly calls bio_endio() and disk_stat_add() when > completing request. But those can be replaced with > __