On Mon, May 16, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> > CONFIG_64BIT=y
> It doesn't appear this patch ever landed in Mainline. Olaf, do you have
> plans to submit this patch?
Yes, will do.
Olaf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@
.kernel.org; linux-
> s...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] storvsc: use small sg_tablesize on x86
>
> On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 07:48 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> > > It's not really architecture independent, is
ect: Re: [PATCH] storvsc: use small sg_tablesize on x86
>
> On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 07:48 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> > > It's not really architecture independent, is it? Just use the bit
> > > width config.
>
On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 07:48 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > It's not really architecture independent, is it? Just use the bit
> > width config.
>
> Again: which one? This driver is not for mips|powerpc|score|sh.
zgrep CONFIG_.*BIT /proc/config.gz
[...]
C
On Wed, Jan 27, James Bottomley wrote:
> It's not really architecture independent, is it? Just use the bit
> width config.
Again: which one? This driver is not for mips|powerpc|score|sh.
Olaf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to ma
ux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > s...@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] storvsc: use small sg_tablesize on x86
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 02, Olaf Hering wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 01, James Bottomley wrote:
> > >
> > > > On
> -Original Message-
> From: Olaf Hering [mailto:o...@aepfle.de]
> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 12:35 AM
> To: James Bottomley
> Cc: KY Srinivasan ; Haiyang Zhang
> ; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> s...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] storvsc: u
On Fri, Oct 02, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 20:30 +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
>
> > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_32)
>
> > Um, this is a bit architecture specific (I know Azure is x86, but
> > still). Can you make the define check CONF
On Thu, Oct 01, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 20:30 +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_32)
> Um, this is a bit architecture specific (I know Azure is x86, but
> still). Can you make the define check CONFIG_32BIT rather than
> CONFIG_X86_32?
According to
> -Original Message-
> From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2015 1:52 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: Olaf Hering ; Haiyang Zhang
> ; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> s...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject:
On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 20:30 +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Olaf Hering [mailto:o...@aepfle.de]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 3:07 AM
> > To: KY Srinivasan ; Haiyang Zhang
> > ; jbottom...@odin.com
> > Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-scsi@vger.
> -Original Message-
> From: Olaf Hering [mailto:o...@aepfle.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 3:07 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan ; Haiyang Zhang
> ; jbottom...@odin.com
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; Olaf Hering
>
> Subject: [PATCH] storvsc: use small sg_t
12 matches
Mail list logo
