On 2017-11-21 20:45, Subhash Jadavani wrote:
> On 2017-11-13 01:14, Michal Potomski wrote:
> > From: Michał Potomski
> >
> > Recent testing of Runtime PM for UFS has shown it's not working as
> > intended. To acheive fully working Runtime PM, first we have to put
> > back scsi_device autopm refere
On 2017-11-13 01:14, Michal Potomski wrote:
From: Michał Potomski
Recent testing of Runtime PM for UFS has shown it's not
working as intended. To acheive fully working Runtime PM,
first we have to put back scsi_device autopm reference counter.
Existing implementation was prone to races and n
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-scsi-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-scsi-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Michal Potomski
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2017 11:17 AM
> To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: vinholika...@gmail.com; martin.peter...@oracle.com;
> j...@linux.vnet
Hi Michał,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on scsi/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.14-rc8 next-20171109]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-c
Hi Michał,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on scsi/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.14-rc8 next-20171109]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/
5 matches
Mail list logo
