On Friday 26 October 2007 5:47:57 pm James Bottomley wrote:
> > > http://www.t10.org/ftp/t10/drafts/sam3/sam3r14.pdf
> > > http://www.t10.org/ftp/t10/drafts/sam4/sam4r13.pdf
> >
> > Unfortunately those two documents are 127 pages and 148 pages,
> > respectively, and I haven't had a chance to make a
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 05:29:53PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> Ok, I'm unclear on what a LUN is. All the devices I have lying around give
> me
> a LUN of zero. I used to think that a LUN was a bit like partition, and
> mostly used for CD changes. The structure "scsi_target" seems to aggregate
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 17:29 -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Friday 26 October 2007 4:09:37 pm James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 15:07 -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > I don't understanding this code:
> > >
> > > 1) for echo "scsi add-single-device 0 1 2 3" > /proc/scsi/scsi, is this
>
On Friday 26 October 2007 4:09:37 pm James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 15:07 -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > I don't understanding this code:
> >
> > 1) for echo "scsi add-single-device 0 1 2 3" > /proc/scsi/scsi, is this
> > only for parallel scsi?
>
> No.
>
> > I thought most modern b
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 15:07 -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> I don't understanding this code:
>
> 1) for echo "scsi add-single-device 0 1 2 3" > /proc/scsi/scsi, is this only
> for parallel scsi?
No.
> I thought most modern busses (usb, sata, FC, firewire,
> etc) dynamically assign these numbers
I don't understanding this code:
1) for echo "scsi add-single-device 0 1 2 3" > /proc/scsi/scsi, is this only
for parallel scsi? I thought most modern busses (usb, sata, FC, firewire,
etc) dynamically assign these numbers and just use them as a unique
identifier ala kdev_t. How would this wor
6 matches
Mail list logo
