On 13-10-03 03:11 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 05:44:35PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 08:13:02PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 05:38:04PM -0400, Rich wrote:
Apparently, only about 4 months.
P17 firmware is out.
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 04:07:31PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> I, and a few others, have scripted the hell out of sas2ircu and a few
> other things on various platforms.
>
Been there, done that :) I was mostly wondering if there are other tools
so I could evaluate if it makes sense to continue wrapping
I, and a few others, have scripted the hell out of sas2ircu and a few
other things on various platforms.
I haven't had time to clean up mine and post it publicly yet (it's all
in VCS, I use it a lot, on Windows + Linux + Solaris...), but
https://github.com/swacquie/DiskMap is an example on Solaris
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 05:44:35PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 08:13:02PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 05:38:04PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> > >Apparently, only about 4 months.
> > >P17 firmware is out.
> > >Tested on a card which was d
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 08:13:02PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 05:38:04PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> >Apparently, only about 4 months.
> >P17 firmware is out.
> >Tested on a card which was demonstrating the incorrect behavior before,
> > of
> >model 9201-16i.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 05:38:04PM -0400, Rich wrote:
>Apparently, only about 4 months.
>P17 firmware is out.
>Tested on a card which was demonstrating the incorrect behavior before, of
>model 9201-16i.
>It does appear to contain the fixes for this problem.
This is great news,
Resending as plain-text (hopefully) so linux-scsi doesn't bounce it...
Apparently, only about 4 months.
P17 firmware is out.
Tested on a card which was demonstrating the incorrect behavior
before, of model 9201-16i.
It does appear to contain the fixes for this problem.
--
To unsubscribe from th
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 09:41:42PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:35:02PM -0500, Rich wrote:
> >Nope, I'm wrong.
>
> :(
>
> >I flashed P15 on a machine, and the same behavior persisted, right up to
> >and including the "groups of 3 devices light up when I d
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 08:28:58PM -0400, Rich wrote:
>I'm told that the fix won't actually be in until P17, because it involved
>touching a large number of codepaths, but that it will be in P17.
>
That's unfortunate.. so another 5-6 months.
Thanks for the info!
-- Pasi
>- Rich
>
>
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:35:02PM -0500, Rich wrote:
>Nope, I'm wrong.
:(
>I flashed P15 on a machine, and the same behavior persisted, right up to
>and including the "groups of 3 devices light up when I do my own
>smp_write_gpio".
>Whereas if I flash the experimental blob I
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:00:43PM -0500, Rich wrote:
>From the LSI P15 F/W release notes:
>SCGCQ00342805 (DFCT) Â - SlotStatus updates to SES managed Enclosure may
>update incorrect slots
>"Modified FW to use SES diag page 0Ah mapping only if SMP Discover
>DeviceSlotNum is used
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 11:55:25AM -0400, Rich wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 07:13:15PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:07:45PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 11:55:25AM -0400, Rich wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 07:13:15PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:07:45PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 07:13:15PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:07:45PM -0400, Rich wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Emmanu
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 07:13:15PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:07:45PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> > >> Le Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:47:11 +0300
> >
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:14:35PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:07:45PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Emmanuel Florac
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:07:45PM -0400, Rich wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
>> >> Le Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:47:11 +0300
>> >> Pasi Kä
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:07:45PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> >> Le Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:47:11 +0300
> >> Pasi Kärkkäinen écrivait:
> >>
> >> > Any replies from Supermicro/LSI
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
>> Le Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:47:11 +0300
>> Pasi Kärkkäinen écrivait:
>>
>> > Any replies from Supermicro/LSI ?
>> >
>>
>> Only loosely related, but Supermicro replaced recentl
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> Le Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:47:11 +0300
> Pasi Kärkkäinen écrivait:
>
> > Any replies from Supermicro/LSI ?
> >
>
> Only loosely related, but Supermicro replaced recently my 846E26 (dual
> expander backplane) with 846E16 (single exp
Le Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:47:11 +0300
Pasi Kärkkäinen écrivait:
> Any replies from Supermicro/LSI ?
>
Only loosely related, but Supermicro replaced recently my 846E26 (dual
expander backplane) with 846E16 (single expander). Apparently they
gave up getting the E26 to work properly or something: LS
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 09:47:17AM -0400, Rich wrote:
> I've got open discussions with both Supermicro and LSI at the moment,
> and have shipped one of them a backplane and HBA to demonstrate this
> since they couldn't replicate it easily in-house.
>
Hello,
Any replies from Supermicro/LSI ?
--
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:01:08AM -0400, Rich wrote:
> My short example would be something like the original message, but In
> brief, pages 27-28 of SFF-8485 [tables 24-27, in section 8.4.4 "GPIO
> transmit registers"] have what you want - I could reproduce the table
> here, but that'd be convolut
My short example would be something like the original message, but In
brief, pages 27-28 of SFF-8485 [tables 24-27, in section 8.4.4 "GPIO
transmit registers"] have what you want - I could reproduce the table
here, but that'd be convoluted to do in text. :)
With two LSI 9201-16i HBA attached, man
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 09:47:17AM -0400, Rich wrote:
> I've got open discussions with both Supermicro and LSI at the moment,
> and have shipped one of them a backplane and HBA to demonstrate this
> since they couldn't replicate it easily in-house.
>
Cool! Let's hope they'll be able to fix it..
I've got open discussions with both Supermicro and LSI at the moment,
and have shipped one of them a backplane and HBA to demonstrate this
since they couldn't replicate it easily in-house.
I also wouldn't claim SGPIO is "disabled" on any of these cards - any
of the RAID cards don't expose the virt
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 03:50:00PM +0300, Harri Olin wrote:
> On 19.8.2012 13:25, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >>To be brief, the sas2ircu toolset works perfectly fine with IT mode
> >>HBAs - just not with passive backplanes AFAICS [e.g. the 846A, versus
> >>the 846EL2].
> >Ok. So with an expander back
On 19.8.2012 13:25, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
To be brief, the sas2ircu toolset works perfectly fine with IT mode
HBAs - just not with passive backplanes AFAICS [e.g. the 846A, versus
the 846EL2].
Ok. So with an expander backplane (846EL*) with SES, sas2ircu is able to
control leds?
"LOCATE" comma
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 08:10:27PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> I actually have a lot of information I can share about this since I
> wrote this email.
>
Great!
> To be brief, the sas2ircu toolset works perfectly fine with IT mode
> HBAs - just not with passive backplanes AFAICS [e.g. the 846A, versus
>
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 09:54:58PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> [My apologies if this is the wrong mailing list for this, but it
> seemed to be the most relevant. Please direct me elsewhere and discard
> if this is OT.]
>
This is a perfectly fine list, hopefully :)
> Hi all,
>
Hello,
> I've been beati
I actually have a lot of information I can share about this since I
wrote this email.
To be brief, the sas2ircu toolset works perfectly fine with IT mode
HBAs - just not with passive backplanes AFAICS [e.g. the 846A, versus
the 846EL2].
Also, the bug I'm experiencing is not present with the SAS23
31 matches
Mail list logo
