On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 10:37 +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 11:09:46PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> > Off the cuff, this really looks like something for the SCSI layer. I'll
> > bet there are SCSI devices that do something similar...
> >
> > And, I'm generally reluctant to m
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 11:09:46PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> Off the cuff, this really looks like something for the SCSI layer. I'll
> bet there are SCSI devices that do something similar...
>
> And, I'm generally reluctant to modify the data to/from a device unless
> usb-storage *really* has
Off the cuff, this really looks like something for the SCSI layer. I'll
bet there are SCSI devices that do something similar...
And, I'm generally reluctant to modify the data to/from a device unless
usb-storage *really* has to in order to make it work
Matt
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 04:58:17P
Hi,
I have an usb-storage enclosure that houses a normal desktop
harddrive. I have been wondering why disks in that enclosure
seemed to be having less errors than when connected to a
normal IDE connector.
The reason is: USB-storage is ignoring a hint that something is
wrong. Probably my enc
4 matches
Mail list logo