Re: Dirty/Writeback fields in /proc/meminfo affected by 20d74bf29c

2016-08-06 Thread Tomas Vondra
On 08/04/2016 10:55 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 04:36:28 +0200 Tomas Vondra wrote: Hi, While investigating a strange OOM issue on the 3.18.x branch (which turned out to be already fixed by 52c84a95), I've noticed a strange difference in Dirty/Writeback fields in /proc/meminfo

Re: Dirty/Writeback fields in /proc/meminfo affected by 20d74bf29c

2016-08-04 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 04:36:28 +0200 Tomas Vondra wrote: > Hi, > > While investigating a strange OOM issue on the 3.18.x branch (which > turned out to be already fixed by 52c84a95), I've noticed a strange > difference in Dirty/Writeback fields in /proc/meminfo depending on > kernel version. I'm