gt; wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Sep 15 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:16:35 -0700
> > > > > Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>
> > > > On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:16:35 -0700
> > > > Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > > > > Can you try this patch (against 2.6.23-rc4-mm1)?
> > > > > &g
; wrote:
> > >
> > > > FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > > > Can you try this patch (against 2.6.23-rc4-mm1)?
> > > > >
> > > > > >From 592bd2049cb3e6e1f1dde7cf631879f26ddffeaa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> > > > > >2001
&g
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:28:19 +0200
Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:16:35 -0700
> > Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > &g
On Sat, Sep 15 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:16:35 -0700
> Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > Can you try this patch (against 2.6.23-rc4-mm1)?
> > >
> > > >From 592bd2049cb3e6
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:16:35 -0700
Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > Can you try this patch (against 2.6.23-rc4-mm1)?
> >
> > >From 592bd2049cb3e6e1f1dde7cf631879f26ddffeaa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: FUJITA Tomonori &
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> Can you try this patch (against 2.6.23-rc4-mm1)?
>
> >From 592bd2049cb3e6e1f1dde7cf631879f26ddffeaa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 04:17:13 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] qla1280: sg cha
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:01:03 +0200 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/14/07, Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 04:31:12AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > [...]
> > >
> > > Even if we revert the qla1280 patch, scsi-ml still sends chaining sg
> >
On 9/14/07, Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 04:31:12AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > Even if we revert the qla1280 patch, scsi-ml still sends chaining sg
> > list. So it doesn't work.
> >
> > The following patch disables chaining sg list for qla12
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 04:31:12AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
[...]
> > The only patch which touches qla1280 is git-block.patch. From a quick
> > squizz the change looks OK, although it's tricky and something might have
> > broken.
> >
> > (the dprintk at line 2929 needs to print remseg, not s
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 04:10:47AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > The only patch which touches qla1280 is git-block.patch. From a quick
> > squizz the change looks OK, although it's tricky and something might have
> > broken.
>
> Can you try this patch (again
bably a different
> > > bug, with the same symptoms.
> >
> > This might be a sg chaining bug too (probabaly sg chaining libata
> > patch).
> >
> > Can you try the following patch that I've just sent:
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/10/251
> &g
g too (probabaly sg chaining libata
> patch).
>
> Can you try the following patch that I've just sent:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/10/251
>
> The patch also disables chaining sg list for libata.
>
With this patch 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 works for me.
Mainline 2.6.23-rc5-git1 wo
7 18:49:26 +0100 Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have a couple of old NUMA-Q systems which are unable to read their
> > > > boot disks with 2.6.23-rc4-mm1. The disks appear to be recognised and
> > > > even t
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > I reported a similar problem on Sep 1, but until now got no response.
>
> You still haven't had a response ;) Let's add a cc.
But the mail from Andy was a nice point to try to another cc, i.e.
linux-scsi that you added. :)
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:19:26 -0700
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:49:26 +0100 Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have a couple of old NUMA-Q systems which are unable to read their
> > boot disks with 2.6.23-rc
of old NUMA-Q systems which are unable to read their
> > > boot disks with 2.6.23-rc4-mm1. The disks appear to be recognised and
> > > even the partition tables read correctly, and then they go pop:
>
> I reported a similar problem on Sep 1, but until now got no response
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:19:26 -0700
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:49:26 +0100 Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have a couple of old NUMA-Q systems which are unable to read their
> > boot disks with 2.6.23-rc
On 9/10/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:49:26 +0100 Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have a couple of old NUMA-Q systems which are unable to read their
> > boot disks with 2.6.23-rc4-mm1. The disks appear to
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:49:26 +0100 Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a couple of old NUMA-Q systems which are unable to read their
> boot disks with 2.6.23-rc4-mm1. The disks appear to be recognised and
> even the partition tables read correctly, and t
20 matches
Mail list logo
