Re: [Stgt-devel] Performance of SCST versus STGT

2008-01-24 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Jan 24, 2008 8:06 AM, Robin Humble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 01:32:08PM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > > >. > >. . STGT read SCST read.

Re: [Stgt-devel] Performance of SCST versus STGT

2008-01-24 Thread Vladislav Bolkhovitin
Robin Humble wrote: On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:36:45AM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote: On Jan 24, 2008 8:06 AM, Robin Humble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 01:32:08PM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:

Re: [Stgt-devel] Performance of SCST versus STGT

2008-01-24 Thread Robin Humble
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:36:45AM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote: >On Jan 24, 2008 8:06 AM, Robin Humble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 01:32:08PM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> >. >>

Re: [Stgt-devel] Performance of SCST versus STGT

2008-01-24 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Jan 24, 2008 8:06 AM, Robin Humble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 01:32:08PM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > > >. > >. . STGT read SCST read.

Re: [Stgt-devel] Performance of SCST versus STGT

2008-01-23 Thread Robin Humble
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 01:32:08PM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote: >On Jan 22, 2008 12:33 PM, Vladislav Bolkhovitin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What are the new SRPT/iSER numbers? >You can find the new performance numbers below. These are all numbers for >reading from the remote buffer cache, no ac

Re: [Stgt-devel] Performance of SCST versus STGT

2008-01-17 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Jan 17, 2008 1:29 PM, Robin Humble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > was iscsiadm was pointed at the IP of the IPoIB interface on the target? I > think tgtd requires that. > > how about setting the transport to be iser with eg. > iscsiadm --mode node --targetname --portal :3260 --op > update -n

Re: [Scst-devel] [Stgt-devel] Performance of SCST versus STGT

2008-01-17 Thread Vladislav Bolkhovitin
Robin Humble wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:34:46PM +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: Hmm, I can't find which IB hardware did he use and it's declared Gbps speed. He declared only "Mellanox 4X SDR, switch". What does it mean? SDR is 10Gbit carrier, at most about ~900MB/s data rate. DDR

Re: [Stgt-devel] Performance of SCST versus STGT

2008-01-17 Thread Robin Humble
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:34:46PM +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: >Hmm, I can't find which IB hardware did he use and it's declared Gbps >speed. He declared only "Mellanox 4X SDR, switch". What does it mean? SDR is 10Gbit carrier, at most about ~900MB/s data rate. DDR is 20Gbit carrier, at