Re: [RFC v2 00/20] Replace PCI pool by DMA pool API

2017-02-18 Thread Peter Senna Tschudin
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 09:35:36AM +0100, Romain Perier wrote: Tested all patches by compilation and checkpatch. All of them compile fine, but patches 11 and 12 need some fixes. You can resend as PATCH instead of RFC. > The current PCI pool API are simple macro functions direct expanded to > the

Re: [RFC v2 00/20] Replace PCI pool by DMA pool API

2017-02-18 Thread Romain Perier
Le 18/02/2017 à 14:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman a écrit : > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 09:35:36AM +0100, Romain Perier wrote: >> The current PCI pool API are simple macro functions direct expanded to >> the appropriated dma pool functions. The prototypes are almost the same >> and semantically, they are v

Re: [RFC v2 00/20] Replace PCI pool by DMA pool API

2017-02-18 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 09:35:36AM +0100, Romain Perier wrote: > The current PCI pool API are simple macro functions direct expanded to > the appropriated dma pool functions. The prototypes are almost the same > and semantically, they are very similar. I propose to use the DMA pool > API directly a