On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 09:08:46AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> The main thing I don't like is that we've spent a lot of time moving
> sense prints into a library so that if someone gullible^Wsensible enough
> to want to do a reporting infrastructure comes along, we have all the
> entry points n
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 12:51 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 07:21:26AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > I'm in two minds about printing the 'Device not ready' twice. On the
> > one hand, it's redundant information. On the other hand, it helps the
> > harried sysadmin with m
> "Matthew" == Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthew> After three weeks with no discussion, I guess it may as well
Matthew> be applied.
Matthew> scsi: Better error messages when device not ready
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Martin K. P
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 07:21:26AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> I'm in two minds about printing the 'Device not ready' twice. On the
> one hand, it's redundant information. On the other hand, it helps the
> harried sysadmin with multiple simultaneous disc failures tie the two
> messages togethe
scsi_print_sense_hdr prints KERN_INFO, making the output from
scsi_io_completion ugly:
sd 0:0:0:0: [sdb] Device not ready: <6>: Sense Key : 0x2 [current]
: ASC=0x4 ASCQ=0x3
By duplicating some of the code from it, we can get the nicer output:
sd 0:0:0:0: [sdb] Device not ready: Sense Key : Not
5 matches
Mail list logo
