James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 10:07 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>But this is not the root problem.
>>
>> target5:0:10: FAST-160 WIDE SCSI 320.0 MB/s ST IU (6.25 ns, offset 127)
>>scsi5: target 10 synchronous with period = 0x8, offset =
>>0x7f(RDSTRM|DT|IU|QAS)
>>
>>So, the ppr_o
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 10:07 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> But this is not the root problem.
>
> target5:0:10: FAST-160 WIDE SCSI 320.0 MB/s ST IU (6.25 ns, offset 127)
> scsi5: target 10 synchronous with period = 0x8, offset =
> 0x7f(RDSTRM|DT|IU|QAS)
>
> So, the ppr_options (which have genera
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 16:40 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>I've finished the update of aic79xx to make use of the
>>scsi_transport_spi infrastructure.
>>The first patch is actually jgarzik's one, with some additions to make
>>it work :-)
>>The second patch is the integrati
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 16:40 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> I've finished the update of aic79xx to make use of the
> scsi_transport_spi infrastructure.
> The first patch is actually jgarzik's one, with some additions to make
> it work :-)
> The second patch is the integration proper. patch made a m
Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Hi James,
I've finished the update of aic79xx to make use of the
scsi_transport_spi infrastructure.
The first patch is actually jgarzik's one, with some additions to make
it work :-)
The second patch is the integration proper. patch made a mess of it,
however, so better to
Hi James,
I've finished the update of aic79xx to make use of the
scsi_transport_spi infrastructure.
The first patch is actually jgarzik's one, with some additions to make
it work :-)
The second patch is the integration proper. patch made a mess of it,
however, so better to compare the files by han
6 matches
Mail list logo