On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:10:25PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:04:21PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > So we keep things as they are right now or are we getting also rid of
> > the internal list? This was tested by Johannes and Chad (claimed to do
> > te
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:04:21PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> So we keep things as they are right now or are we getting also rid of
> the internal list? This was tested by Johannes and Chad (claimed to do
> testing)
IFF the patches actually are tested as-is let's get them in. I don
On 2016-11-07 17:48:46 [+0100], Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 05:46:29PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > sorry for the confusion in the subject. If I remember correctly you said
> > that we may not have enough room for a larger / work_struct struct and I
> > should
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 05:46:29PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> sorry for the confusion in the subject. If I remember correctly you said
> that we may not have enough room for a larger / work_struct struct and I
> should keep the list for now.
But that was for libfc where it only has
On 2016-11-07 17:38:48 [+0100], Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> You're right it does - between the incorrect subject and the fact
> that it still keeps the linked list of items arounds instead of fully
> using the workqueue infrastructure I was a bit confused before my
> first coffee this morning. Same
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 05:31:03PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2016, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > It seems like the whole damn driver should just use threaded interrupts.
> > Of course it's a giant beast and not just the iSCSI one. But even
> > if we don't go all the way I'd m
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> It seems like the whole damn driver should just use threaded interrupts.
> Of course it's a giant beast and not just the iSCSI one. But even
> if we don't go all the way I'd much prefer workqueues. kthread work
> is simply the worst API ever and I'd
7 matches
Mail list logo
