On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 19:06 +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>
> On 02/03/2017 05:19 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 02:38:35PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > > On 02/03/2017 02:31 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > > - if (sg_res_in_use(sfp)) {
> > > > >
On 02/03/2017 05:19 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 02:38:35PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 02/03/2017 02:31 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
- if (sg_res_in_use(sfp)) {
+ mutex_lock(&sfp->f_mutex);
+ if (sfp->res_in_use) {
+
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 02:38:35PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 02/03/2017 02:31 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >> - if (sg_res_in_use(sfp)) {
> >> + mutex_lock(&sfp->f_mutex);
> >> + if (sfp->res_in_use) {
> >> + mutex_unlock(&sfp->f_mutex);
> >>
On 02/03/2017 02:31 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> -if (sg_res_in_use(sfp)) {
>> +mutex_lock(&sfp->f_mutex);
>> +if (sfp->res_in_use) {
>> +mutex_unlock(&sfp->f_mutex);
>> sg_remove_request(sfp, srp);
>>
> - if (sg_res_in_use(sfp)) {
> + mutex_lock(&sfp->f_mutex);
> + if (sfp->res_in_use) {
> + mutex_unlock(&sfp->f_mutex);
> sg_remove_request(sfp, srp);
> return -EBUSY; /* reserve buffer already bei
The 'reserved' page array is used as a short-cut for mapping
data, saving us to allocate pages per request.
However, the 'reserved' array is only capable of holding one
request, so this patch introduces a mutex for protect
'sg_fd' against concurrent accesses.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke
Review
6 matches
Mail list logo