Re: [PATCHv2] st: remove st_mutex

2012-09-24 Thread Lee Duncan
On 09/24/2012 02:06 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 15:36 -0700, Lee Duncan wrote: >> From: Hannes Reinecke >> >> The st_mutex was created when the BKL was removed, and >> prevents simultaneous st_open calls. It is better to >> protect just the necessary data. >> >> Signed-off-b

Re: [PATCHv2] st: remove st_mutex

2012-09-24 Thread James Bottomley
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 15:36 -0700, Lee Duncan wrote: > From: Hannes Reinecke > > The st_mutex was created when the BKL was removed, and > prevents simultaneous st_open calls. It is better to > protect just the necessary data. > > Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke > Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan That s

Re: [PATCHv2] st: remove st_mutex

2012-09-23 Thread Kai Makisara
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Lee Duncan wrote: > From: Hannes Reinecke > > The st_mutex was created when the BKL was removed, and > prevents simultaneous st_open calls. It is better to > protect just the necessary data. > > Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke > Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan Acked-by: Kai Mäkis

[PATCHv2] st: remove st_mutex

2012-09-10 Thread Lee Duncan
From: Hannes Reinecke The st_mutex was created when the BKL was removed, and prevents simultaneous st_open calls. It is better to protect just the necessary data. Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan This patch is based on the "misc" branch of the SCSI tree and the 5-patch s