Re: [PATCHv2] pm80xx: fix Adaptec 71605H hang

2013-08-21 Thread Jack Wang
On 07/31/2013 05:19 PM, Jack Wang wrote: > On 07/26/2013 06:43 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: >> The IO command size is 128 bytes for these new controllers as opposed to 64 >> for the old 8001 controller. >> >> The Adaptec out-of-tree driver did this correctly. After comparing the two >> this turned out t

Re: [PATCHv2] pm80xx: fix Adaptec 71605H hang

2013-07-31 Thread Jack Wang
On 07/26/2013 06:43 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > The IO command size is 128 bytes for these new controllers as opposed to 64 > for the old 8001 controller. > > The Adaptec out-of-tree driver did this correctly. After comparing the two > this turned out to be the crucial difference. > > So don't hard

RE: [PATCHv2] pm80xx: fix Adaptec 71605H hang

2013-07-26 Thread Anand Kumar Santhanam
; Sangeetha Gnanasekaran; xjtu...@gmail.com Subject: [PATCHv2] pm80xx: fix Adaptec 71605H hang The IO command size is 128 bytes for these new controllers as opposed to 64 for the old 8001 controller. The Adaptec out-of-tree driver did this correctly. After comparing the two this turned out to be the

[PATCHv2] pm80xx: fix Adaptec 71605H hang

2013-07-26 Thread Hans Verkuil
The IO command size is 128 bytes for these new controllers as opposed to 64 for the old 8001 controller. The Adaptec out-of-tree driver did this correctly. After comparing the two this turned out to be the crucial difference. So don't hardcode the IO command size, instead use pm8001_ha->iomb_size