On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 08:52:32PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24 2015, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>
> > This reduces the impact of choosing CONFIG_SCSI_CONSTANTS by about 8KB.
> >
>
> ping? does anyone feel like picking these up?
Please resend them against the current tree. I'm
On Tue, Nov 24 2015, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> This reduces the impact of choosing CONFIG_SCSI_CONSTANTS by about 8KB.
>
ping? does anyone feel like picking these up?
Rasmus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kerne
On 15-11-24 04:42 AM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
This reduces the impact of choosing by about 8KB.
2dd951ecd511 ("scsi: Conditionally compile in constants.c") updated
the Kconfig help text from 12KB to 75KB. The 12K predated git so was
certainly outdated. But I'm not sure where the 75K comes from;
On 11/24/2015 10:42 AM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> This reduces the impact of choosing CONFIG_SCSI_CONSTANTS by about 8KB.
>
> 2dd951ecd511 ("scsi: Conditionally compile in constants.c") updated
> the Kconfig help text from 12KB to 75KB. The 12K predated git so was
> certainly outdated. But I'm not
This reduces the impact of choosing CONFIG_SCSI_CONSTANTS by about 8KB.
2dd951ecd511 ("scsi: Conditionally compile in constants.c") updated
the Kconfig help text from 12KB to 75KB. The 12K predated git so was
certainly outdated. But I'm not sure where the 75K comes from; using
size(1) on a defconf
5 matches
Mail list logo