On 2016-03-30 18:43, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 09:09 +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
[resend with linux-scsi@ in Cc, my apologies]
This is a follow up to "scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state
to scsi_target_state".
If anyone has an idea how to create a regression tes
K. Petersen" , "James E.J. Bottomley"
, "Hannes Reinecke" , "Christoph
Hellwig" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 12:30:27 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Update SCSI target removal path
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 13:01 +0200, jthumshirn wr
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 09:09 +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> [resend with linux-scsi@ in Cc, my apologies]
>
> This is a follow up to "scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state
> to scsi_target_state".
>
> If anyone has an idea how to create a regression test suite for the
> target removal
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 13:01 +0200, jthumshirn wrote:
> [+Cc linux-scsi back]
> On 2016-03-30 02:59, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >> "Ewan" == Ewan D Milne writes:
> >
> > Ewan> I would probably use an APCON or other physical layer switch to
> > Ewan> drop the FC link and test the error recover
[+Cc linux-scsi back]
On 2016-03-30 02:59, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
"Ewan" == Ewan D Milne writes:
Ewan> I would probably use an APCON or other physical layer switch to
Ewan> drop the FC link and test the error recovery/device loss. But we
Ewan> don't have one.
They go for a couple of hundr
[resend with linux-scsi@ in Cc, my apologies]
This is a follow up to "scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state to
scsi_target_state".
If anyone has an idea how to create a regression test suite for the target
removal path I'd be all ears, given the fact that this is the 3rd or 4th patch
targe
6 matches
Mail list logo
