Doug,
> I checked the code for the ABORTED COMMAND asc=0x10 case. That is a
> bunch of Protection Information errors which retrying would be
> pointless. And the existing code does check for that just before the
> new check for BLIST_ABORTED_CMD_QUIRK. The PI check has the cryptic
> comment /* DI
Martin,
> Introduce a new blist flag that indicates the device may return certain
> sense code/ASC/ASCQ combinations that indicate different treatment than
> normal. In particular, some devices need unconditional retry (aka
> ADD_TO_MLQUEUE) under certain conditions; otherwise path failures may b
On 2018-02-23 08:33 AM, Martin Wilck wrote:
Gentle reminder - reviews welcome ...
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 11:25 +0100, Martin Wilck wrote:
Introduce a new blist flag that indicates the device may return
certain
sense code/ASC/ASCQ combinations that indicate different treatment
than
normal. In par
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 11:25 +0100, Martin Wilck wrote:
> Introduce a new blist flag that indicates the device may return certain
> sense code/ASC/ASCQ combinations that indicate different treatment than
> normal. In particular, some devices need unconditional retry (aka
> ADD_TO_MLQUEUE) under cert
Gentle reminder - reviews welcome ...
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 11:25 +0100, Martin Wilck wrote:
> Introduce a new blist flag that indicates the device may return
> certain
> sense code/ASC/ASCQ combinations that indicate different treatment
> than
> normal. In particular, some devices need unconditio
Introduce a new blist flag that indicates the device may return certain
sense code/ASC/ASCQ combinations that indicate different treatment than
normal. In particular, some devices need unconditional retry (aka
ADD_TO_MLQUEUE) under certain conditions; otherwise path failures may be
falsely detected
6 matches
Mail list logo
