On Thursday, June 23, 2016 9:27:30 AM CEST Tomas Winkler wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 22, 2016 2:44:21 PM CEST Tomas Winkler wrote:
> >> >
> >> > There are more than 20 files that have the statement: case cpu_to_...
> >> > Sparse complains a
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 22, 2016 2:44:21 PM CEST Tomas Winkler wrote:
>> >
>> > There are more than 20 files that have the statement: case cpu_to_...
>> > Sparse complains about: case __builtin_bswap, not about
>> > __builtin_constant_p.
>>
>> Th
On Wednesday, June 22, 2016 2:44:21 PM CEST Tomas Winkler wrote:
> >
> > There are more than 20 files that have the statement: case cpu_to_...
> > Sparse complains about: case __builtin_bswap, not about
> > __builtin_constant_p.
>
> There is even much more in the header files used in initializer
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Levy, Amir (Jer)
wrote:
> On 2016-06-22 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wednesday, June 22, 2016 11:24:50 AM CEST Tomas Winkler wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Tomas Winkler
>> wrote:
>> > > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann
>> wrote:
>> > >>
On 2016-06-22 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 22, 2016 11:24:50 AM CEST Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Tomas Winkler
> wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann
> wrote:
> > >> On Monday 02 May 2016 16:32:25 Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > >> #i
On Wednesday, June 22, 2016 11:24:50 AM CEST Tomas Winkler wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Monday 02 May 2016 16:32:25 Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> #ifdef __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP32__
> >> -#define __swab3
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Monday 02 May 2016 16:32:25 Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Tue, 03 May 2016 01:10:16 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Monday 02 May 2016 16:02:18 Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> > > O
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 02 May 2016 16:32:25 Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 03 May 2016 01:10:16 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> > On Monday 02 May 2016 16:02:18 Andrew Morton wrote:
>> > > On Mon, 02 May 2016 23:48:19 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > >
On Monday 02 May 2016 16:32:25 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 03 May 2016 01:10:16 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > On Monday 02 May 2016 16:02:18 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 02 May 2016 23:48:19 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is another attempt to avoid a regression in ww
On Tue, 03 May 2016 01:10:16 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 02 May 2016 16:02:18 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 May 2016 23:48:19 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > > This is another attempt to avoid a regression in wwn_to_u64() after
> > > that started using get_unaligned_be64(),
On Monday 02 May 2016 16:02:18 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 02 May 2016 23:48:19 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > This is another attempt to avoid a regression in wwn_to_u64() after
> > that started using get_unaligned_be64(), which in turn ran into a
> > bug on gcc-4.9 through 6.1.
>
> I'm st
On Mon, 02 May 2016 23:48:19 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> This is another attempt to avoid a regression in wwn_to_u64() after
> that started using get_unaligned_be64(), which in turn ran into a
> bug on gcc-4.9 through 6.1.
I'm still getting a couple screenfuls of things like
net/tipc/name_dist
This is another attempt to avoid a regression in wwn_to_u64() after
that started using get_unaligned_be64(), which in turn ran into a
bug on gcc-4.9 through 6.1.
The regression got introduced due to the combination of two
separate workarounds (e3bde9568d99 and ef3fb2422ffe) that each
try to sidest
13 matches
Mail list logo