Re: [PATCH v1 16/17] scsi: ufs: add delay before putting UFS rails in low power modes

2015-10-26 Thread ygardi
> 2015-09-13 23:52 GMT+09:00 Yaniv Gardi : >> We put the UFS device in sleep state & UFS link in hibern8 state during >> runtime suspaned. After this we put all the UFS rails in low power >> modes immediately but it seems some devices may still draw more than >> sleep current from UFS rails (especi

Re: [PATCH v1 16/17] scsi: ufs: add delay before putting UFS rails in low power modes

2015-10-21 Thread Akinobu Mita
2015-09-13 23:52 GMT+09:00 Yaniv Gardi : > We put the UFS device in sleep state & UFS link in hibern8 state during > runtime suspaned. After this we put all the UFS rails in low power > modes immediately but it seems some devices may still draw more than > sleep current from UFS rails (especially f

[PATCH v1 16/17] scsi: ufs: add delay before putting UFS rails in low power modes

2015-09-13 Thread Yaniv Gardi
We put the UFS device in sleep state & UFS link in hibern8 state during runtime suspaned. After this we put all the UFS rails in low power modes immediately but it seems some devices may still draw more than sleep current from UFS rails (especially from VCCQ rail) atleast for 500us. To avoid this s